210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15950846)
41. Noninvasive cardiac output determination using applanation tonometry-derived radial artery pulse contour analysis in critically ill patients.
Compton F; Wittrock M; Schaefer JH; Zidek W; Tepel M; Scholze A
Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):171-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of the venous catheter site on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables.
Schmidt S; Westhoff TH; Hofmann C; Schaefer JH; Zidek W; Compton F; van der Giet M
Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):783-6. PubMed ID: 17255873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output.
Bubenek-Turconi SI; Craciun M; Miclea I; Perel A
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23757471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
Breukers RB; Jansen JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery by a new transesophageal Doppler device.
Jaeggi P; Hofer CK; Klaghofer R; Fodor P; Genoni M; Zollinger A
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 12698405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Volumetric assessment of left heart preload by thermodilution: comparing the PiCCO-VoLEF system with transoesophageal echocardiography.
Hofer CK; Ganter MT; Matter-Ensner S; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Anaesthesia; 2006 Apr; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16548948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Unreliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output in piglets simulating acute hemorrhagic shock and rapid volume expansion.
Lee CH; Wang JY; Huang KL; Chiu HW; Fei TC; Chen TS; Chang H
J Trauma; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1357-61. PubMed ID: 20539180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Validity and reliability of cardiac output by arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis compared with pulmonary artery thermodilution in intensive care unit.
Werawatganon T; Punyatavorn S; Chatkaew P; Bunburaphong P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S323-30. PubMed ID: 12930006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of cardiac output in OPCAB: bolus thermodilution technique versus pulse contour analysis.
Sujatha P; Mehta Y; Dhar A; Sarkar D; Meharwal ZS; Datt V
Ann Card Anaesth; 2006 Jan; 9(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 17699907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac continuous cardiac output monitor.
Zimmermann A; Kufner C; Hofbauer S; Steinwendner J; Hitzl W; Fritsch G; Schistek R; Kirnbauer M; Pauser G
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Jun; 22(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 18503926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pulse contour cardiac output: an evaluation of the FloTrac method.
Østergaard M; Nielsen J; Nygaard E
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Jun; 26(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 19436173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measuring cardiac output during dobutamine infusion after off-pump coronary artery bypass: comparison of transesophageal echo-Doppler and thermodilution.
Husedzinović I; Barisin S; Tonković D; Sostarić S
Croat Med J; 2002 Dec; 43(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 12476476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis in hemodynamical unstable patients.
Gödje O; Friedl R; Hannekum A
Med Sci Monit; 2001; 7(6):1344-50. PubMed ID: 11687755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Myocardial performance index during rapidly changing loading conditions: impact of different tidal ventilation.
Renner J; Cavus E; Gruenewald M; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Lutter G; Steffen M; Bein B
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18028576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
