These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15950883)

  • 1. Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task.
    Rubichi S; Ricci F; Padovani R; Scaglietti L
    Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 15950883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe.
    Egner T; Jamieson G; Gruzelier J
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 15964211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals.
    Raz A; Moreno-Iñiguez M; Martin L; Zhu H
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 16765063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pseudomemory in hypnotized and simulating subjects.
    Lynn SJ; Rhue JW; Myers BP; Weekes JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1994 Apr; 42(2):118-29. PubMed ID: 8200714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eliminating stroop effects with post-hypnotic instructions: Brain mechanisms inferred from EEG.
    Zahedi A; Stuermer B; Hatami J; Rostami R; Sommer W
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():70-77. PubMed ID: 28077327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis.
    Iani C; Ricci F; Baroni G; Rubichi S
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):856-63. PubMed ID: 19648030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysiological correlates of hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility.
    de Pascalis V
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1999 Apr; 47(2):117-43. PubMed ID: 10208074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypnotic suggestibility predicts the magnitude of the imaginative word blindness suggestion effect in a non-hypnotic context.
    Parris BA; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 23778018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manipulation of attention in highly and low hypnotizable individuals: a study on verbal priming.
    Castellani E; Sebastiani L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Mar; 146(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 18666445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypnotic susceptibility: multidimensional relationships with Cloninger's Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, COMT polymorphisms, absorption, and attentional characteristics.
    Lichtenberg P; Bachner-Melman R; Ebstein RP; Crawford HJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2004 Jan; 52(1):47-72. PubMed ID: 14768969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of hypnotizability on performance of a Stroop task and event-related potentials.
    Nordby H; Hugdahl K; Jasiukaitis P; Spiegel D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):819-30. PubMed ID: 10407889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lack of correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and various components of attention.
    Varga K; Németh Z; Szekely A
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1872-81. PubMed ID: 21963402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cognitive demands of hypnotic response.
    Wyzenbeek M; Bryant RA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2012; 60(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 22098570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of attentional bias by hypnotic suggestion: experimental evidence from an emotional Stroop task.
    Brunel J; Mathey S; Colombani S; Delord S
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(3):397-411. PubMed ID: 36591900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor imagery during hypnotic arm paralysis in high and low hypnotizable subjects.
    Roelofs K; Hoogduin KA; Keijsers GP
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2002 Jan; 50(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 11783441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception and modulation of pain in waking and hypnosis: functional significance of phase-ordered gamma oscillations.
    De Pascalis V; Cacace I; Massicolle F
    Pain; 2004 Nov; 112(1-2):27-36. PubMed ID: 15494182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focused analgesia and generalized relaxation produce differential hypnotic analgesia in response to ascending stimulus intensity.
    Sharav Y; Tal M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Apr; 52(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15050376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive strategies in hypnosis: toward resolving the hypnotic conflict.
    Bartis SP; Zamansky HS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Jul; 38(3):168-82. PubMed ID: 2394534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective time estimation and hypnotizability in a simulator design.
    Mozenter RH; Kurtz RM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jul; 40(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 1399154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.