These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15951453)
1. Sufficiently important difference: expanding the framework of clinical significance. Barrett B; Brown D; Mundt M; Brown R Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 15951453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using benefit harm tradeoffs to estimate sufficiently important difference: the case of the common cold. Barrett B; Brown R; Mundt M; Dye L; Alt J; Safdar N; Maberry R Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15673581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: the clinician's perspective. Schünemann HJ; Akl EA; Guyatt GH Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Sep; 4():62. PubMed ID: 16973000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Group cognitive rehabilitation to reduce the psychological impact of multiple sclerosis on quality of life: the CRAMMS RCT. Lincoln NB; Bradshaw LE; Constantinescu CS; Day F; Drummond AE; Fitzsimmons D; Harris S; Montgomery AA; das Nair R Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jan; 24(4):1-182. PubMed ID: 31934845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits, harms, and the design of clinical trials. Brand DA Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(3):246-7. PubMed ID: 15951451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health. Hickie IB; Scott EM; Cross SP; Iorfino F; Davenport TA; Guastella AJ; Naismith SL; Carpenter JS; Rohleder C; Crouse JJ; Hermens DF; Koethe D; Markus Leweke F; Tickell AM; Sawrikar V; Scott J Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211 Suppl 9():S3-S46. PubMed ID: 31679171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT. Beard DJ; Davies LJ; Cook JA; MacLennan G; Price A; Kent S; Hudson J; Carr A; Leal J; Campbell H; Fitzpatrick R; Arden N; Murray D; Campbell MK Health Technol Assess; 2020 Apr; 24(20):1-98. PubMed ID: 32369436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure. Brozek JL; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Sep; 4():69. PubMed ID: 17005037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sufficiently important difference for common cold: severity reduction. Barrett B; Harahan B; Brown D; Zhang Z; Brown R Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 17548849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Smallest worthwhile effect of exercise programs to prevent falls among older people: estimates from benefit-harm trade-off and discrete choice methods. Franco MR; Howard K; Sherrington C; Rose J; Ferreira PH; Ferreira ML Age Ageing; 2016 Nov; 45(6):806-812. PubMed ID: 27496928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]