198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15951673)
1. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of residential geocoding in the Agricultural Health Study.
Jones RR; DellaValle CT; Flory AR; Nordan A; Hoppin JA; Hofmann JN; Chen H; Giglierano J; Lynch CF; Beane Freeman LE; Rushton G; Ward MH
Int J Health Geogr; 2014 Oct; 13():37. PubMed ID: 25292160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
Cayo MR; Talbot TO
Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study.
Fisher JA; Spaur M; Buller ID; Flory AR; Beane Freeman LE; Hofmann JN; Giangrande M; Jones RR; Ward MH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33572119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of local street network characteristics on the positional accuracy of automated geocoding for geographic health studies.
Zimmerman DL; Li J
Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 20158886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of geocoding quality on environmental exposure assessment of children living near high traffic roads.
Zandbergen PA
BMC Public Health; 2007 Mar; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17367533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error and bias in determining exposure potential of children at school locations using proximity-based GIS techniques.
Zandbergen PA; Green JW
Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Sep; 115(9):1363-70. PubMed ID: 17805429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research.
Krieger N; Waterman P; Lemieux K; Zierler S; Hogan JW
Am J Public Health; 2001 Jul; 91(7):1114-6. PubMed ID: 11441740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positional error and time-activity patterns in near-highway proximity studies: an exposure misclassification analysis.
Lane KJ; Kangsen Scammell M; Levy JI; Fuller CH; Parambi R; Zamore W; Mwamburi M; Brugge D
Environ Health; 2013 Sep; 12(1):75. PubMed ID: 24010639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial autocorrelation among automated geocoding errors and its effects on testing for disease clustering.
Zimmerman DL; Li J; Fang X
Stat Med; 2010 Apr; 29(9):1025-36. PubMed ID: 20087879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
