These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15951689)

  • 1. Radiation effectiveness factors for use in calculating probability of causation of radiogenic cancers.
    Kocher DC; Apostoaei AI; Hoffman FO
    Health Phys; 2005 Jul; 89(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 15951689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NCRP Report 181, Evaluation of the Relative Effectiveness of Low-energy Photons and Electrons in Inducing Cancer in Humans: A Critique and Alternative Analysis.
    Kocher DC; Hoffman FO
    Health Phys; 2019 Jun; 116(6):817-827. PubMed ID: 30889098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactive RadioEpidemiological Program (IREP): a web-based tool for estimating probability of causation/assigned share of radiogenic cancers.
    Kocher DC; Apostoaei AI; Henshaw RW; Hoffman FO; Schubauer-Berigan MK; Stancescu DO; Thomas BA; Trabalka JR; Gilbert ES; Land CE
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):119-47. PubMed ID: 18545036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential absorbed dose distributions in lineal energy for neutrons and gamma rays at the mono-energetic neutron calibration facility.
    Takada M; Baba M; Yamaguchi H; Fujitaka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 15914511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra.
    Kellerer AM; Roos H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15695239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation quality of photons in small and large receptors--a microdosimetric analysis.
    Chen J; Roos H; Kellerer AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 16286503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probability Distribution of Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness Factor for use in Estimating Risks of Solid Cancers From Exposure to Low-Let Radiation.
    Kocher DC; Apostoaei AI; Hoffman FO; Trabalka JR
    Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):602-622. PubMed ID: 29697512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating historical radiation doses to a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.
    Simon SL; Weinstock RM; Doody MM; Neton J; Wenzl T; Stewart P; Mohan AK; Yoder RC; Hauptmann M; Freedman DM; Cardarelli J; Feng HA; Bouville A; Linet M
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):174-92. PubMed ID: 16808606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo mixture model of lifetime cancer incidence risk from radiation exposure on shuttle and international space station.
    Peterson LE; Cucinotta FA
    Mutat Res; 1999 Dec; 430(2):327-35. PubMed ID: 10631348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses Part II: site-specific solid cancers.
    Walsh L; Rühm W; Kellerer AM
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2004 Dec; 43(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 15645312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of rapid methods for assessing doses from internally deposited radionuclides.
    Maher EF; McCartney KA; Mize BD; Sun LS; Siebert SR
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 18545033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective dose scaling factors for use with cascade impactor sampling data in tenorm inhalation exposures.
    Kim KP; Wu CY; Birky BK; Bolch WE
    Health Phys; 2005 Oct; 89(4):359-74. PubMed ID: 16155458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk.
    Bennett J; Little MP; Richardson S
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2004 Dec; 43(4):233-45. PubMed ID: 15565453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neutron activation of patients following boron neutron capture therapy of brain tumors at the high flux reactor (HFR) Petten (EORTC Trials 11961 and 11011).
    Wittig A; Moss RL; Stecher-Rasmussen F; Appelman K; Rassow J; Roca A; Sauerwein W
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Dec; 181(12):774-82. PubMed ID: 16362787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
    Hunter N; Muirhead CR
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between protection and operational quantities in dosimetry of photon external exposure-deficiencies of Hp(10).
    Chumak VV; Bakhanova EV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12918787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implications of claimant-favorable approaches used in dose and probability of causation calculations under EEOICPA.
    Merwin SE; Stewart DN; Smith MH; Potter KD; Hinnefeld SL
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):148-59. PubMed ID: 18545037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
    Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer risk estimates for gamma-rays with regard to organ-specific doses. Part I: All solid cancers combined.
    Walsh L; Rühm W; Kellerer AM
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2004 Sep; 43(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 15309386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainties in estimating health risks associated with exposure to ionising radiation.
    Preston RJ; Boice JD; Brill AB; Chakraborty R; Conolly R; Hoffman FO; Hornung RW; Kocher DC; Land CE; Shore RE; Woloschak GE
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):573-88. PubMed ID: 23803503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.