These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15952675)

  • 21. Comparative safety testing of genetically modified foods in a 90-day rat feeding study design allowing the distinction between primary and secondary effects of the new genetic event.
    Knudsen I; Poulsen M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17719159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
    König A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. NAS issues mixed message on unintended effects of GM food.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1062. PubMed ID: 15340456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology.
    Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].
    Nishiura H; Imai H; Nakao H; Tsukino H; Kuroda Y; Katoh T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12508467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods. II: Graded testing.
    Chao E; Krewski D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 18768151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Genetically modified food and allergy].
    Wiackowski SK
    Przegl Lek; 2004; 61 Suppl 3():22-4. PubMed ID: 15682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.
    Varzakas TH; Chryssochoidis G; Argyropoulos D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 17275157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safety assessment of food products from r-DNA animals.
    Lema MA; Burachik M
    Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Mar; 32(2):163-89. PubMed ID: 18258300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preface to the journal supplement dedicated to the early awareness of emerging risks to food and feed safety.
    Kuiper HA; Kleter GA
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 May; 47(5):909-10. PubMed ID: 19232377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Crop conundrum.
    Dubock AC
    Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19146502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Potential adverse health effects of genetically modified crops.
    Bakshi A
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 12746139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.
    Kok EJ; Kuiper HA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):439-44. PubMed ID: 14512230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relevance of gene transfer to the safety of food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) plants.
    van den Eede G; Aarts H; Buhk HJ; Corthier G; Flint HJ; Hammes W; Jacobsen B; Midtvedt T; van der Vossen J; von Wright A; Wackernagel W; Wilcks A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1127-56. PubMed ID: 15123384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Edible safety requirements and assessment standards for agricultural genetically modified organisms.
    Deng P; Zhou X; Zhou P; Du Z; Hou H; Yang D; Tan J; Wu X; Zhang J; Yang Y; Liu J; Liu G; Li Y; Liu J; Yu L; Fang S; Yang X
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46(5):1414-36. PubMed ID: 18289760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Leave GM analysis to the relevant scientists.
    Couvet D
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7049):328. PubMed ID: 16034395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.