These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Weir CJ; Lees KR Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials. Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials. Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties. Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005). Brown DC J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials. Pond GR; Tang PA; Welch SA; Chen EX Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 20406744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias. Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking. Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. Doig GS; Simpson F J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Studies with group treatments required special power calculations, allocation methods, and statistical analyses. Faes MC; Reelick MF; Perry M; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 21856120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-trial networking in AML: a step forward rather than corner cutting. Büchner T; Döhner H; Ehninger G; Ganser A; Niederwieser D; Hasford J Leuk Res; 2004 Jun; 28(6):649-50. PubMed ID: 15120943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical trials. How should they be designed? Onken JE; Brazer SR Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1994 Apr; 4(2):423-34. PubMed ID: 8193874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Allocation of patients to treatment in clinical trials. Pocock SJ Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):183-97. PubMed ID: 497334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]