253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15953515)
1. Influence of cochlear traveling wave and neural adaptation on auditory brainstem responses.
Junius D; Dau T
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):53-67. PubMed ID: 15953515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory brainstem response recording to multiple interleaved broadband chirps.
Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E; Don M; Müller-Mazzotta J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):466-79. PubMed ID: 22343544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay.
Elberling C; Don M; Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2772-85. PubMed ID: 18189568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.
Dau T; Wegner O; Mellert V; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1530-40. PubMed ID: 10738807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Searching for the optimal stimulus eliciting auditory brainstem responses in humans.
Fobel O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2213-22. PubMed ID: 15532653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of frequency modulated chirp stimuli for rapid and sensitive ABR measurements in the rat.
Spankovich C; Hood LJ; Wesley Grantham D; Polley DB
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):92-7. PubMed ID: 18812220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling auditory evoked brainstem responses to transient stimuli.
Rønne FM; Dau T; Harte J; Elberling C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):3903-13. PubMed ID: 22559366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spectral and synchrony differences in auditory brainstem responses evoked by chirps of varying durations.
Petoe MA; Bradley AP; Wilson WJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1896-907. PubMed ID: 20968361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of brief-tone stimulus duration on the brain stem auditory steady-state response.
Mo L; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 18091096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory brainstem responses to broad-band chirps: amplitude growth functions in sedated and anaesthetised infants.
Mühler R; Rahne T; Verhey JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 23062881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory brainstem responses to level-specific chirps in normal-hearing adults.
Kristensen SG; Elberling C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):712-21. PubMed ID: 23072963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An investigation of the use of band-limited chirp stimuli to obtain the auditory brainstem response.
Bell SL; Allen R; Lutman ME
Int J Audiol; 2002 Jul; 41(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 12166686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal nonlinearity during recovery from sequential inhibition by neurons in the cat primary auditory cortex.
Nakamoto KT; Zhang J; Kitzes LM
J Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 95(3):1897-907. PubMed ID: 16339004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory brain stem responses evoked by different chirps based on different delay models.
Cebulla M; Elberling C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):452-60. PubMed ID: 20807481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory brainstem correlates of basilar membrane nonlinearity in humans.
Krishnan A; Plack CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 18827479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison between properties of adaptation of the auditory nerve and the ventral cochlear nucleus in response to repetitive clicks.
Meyer K; Rouiller EM; Loquet G
Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):144-55. PubMed ID: 17391881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From Cochlear Implant Users With Preserved Acoustic Hearing.
Kim JS; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1061-1077. PubMed ID: 36882917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
