BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15953534)

  • 1. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):256-61. PubMed ID: 15953534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to bandwidth variations of bandpass noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):47-54. PubMed ID: 15811698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of center frequency and bandwidth on the auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Matsuoka K
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):64-71. PubMed ID: 16797895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complex tone processing and critical band in the human auditory cortex.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 222(1-2):125-32. PubMed ID: 17081712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to interaural cross-correlation of band-pass noise.
    Soeta Y; Hotehama T; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M; Ando Y
    Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 196(1-2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15464307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of pitch and pitch strength on an auditory-evoked N1m.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(7):783-7. PubMed ID: 18418257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to interaural time delay and interaural correlation.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):106-15. PubMed ID: 16934951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
    Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical processing of quasi-periodic versus random noise sounds.
    Jones SJ
    Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16963209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise.
    Okamoto H; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Kubo T; Pantev C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1957-61. PubMed ID: 15869488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Middle latency auditory-evoked fields reflect psychoacoustic gap detection thresholds in human listeners.
    Rupp A; Gutschalk A; Uppenkamp S; Scherg M
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Oct; 92(4):2239-47. PubMed ID: 15381743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.