These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15953581)

  • 1. The five-parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Anal Biochem; 2005 Aug; 343(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 15953581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear Calibration Model Choice between the Four and Five-Parameter Logistic Models.
    Cumberland WN; Fong Y; Yu X; Defawe O; Frahm N; De Rosa S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):972-83. PubMed ID: 24918306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an asymmetry parameter for curve-fitting in single-chemical and mixture toxicity assessment.
    Dawson DA; Genco N; Bensinger HM; Guinn D; Il'giovine ZJ; Wayne Schultz T; Pöch G
    Toxicology; 2012 Feb; 292(2-3):156-61. PubMed ID: 22210403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose-response curves.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16256244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error models for immunoassays.
    Sadler WA
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2008 Sep; 45(Pt 5):481-5. PubMed ID: 18753420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the four-parameter logistic model to bioassay: comparison with slope ratio and parallel line models.
    Vølund A
    Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 719119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Simple Approach to Determine a Curve Fitting Model with a Correct Weighting Function for Calibration Curves in Quantitative Ligand Binding Assays.
    Xiang Y; Donley J; Seletskaia E; Shingare S; Kamerud J; Gorovits B
    AAPS J; 2018 Mar; 20(3):45. PubMed ID: 29536273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of logistic and polynomial models for fitting sandwich-ELISA calibration curves.
    Herman RA; Scherer PN; Shan G
    J Immunol Methods; 2008 Dec; 339(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 18822292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal designs for asymmetric sigmoidal response curves in bioassays and immunoassays.
    Hyun SW; Wong WK; Yang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):421-436. PubMed ID: 30868935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring parallelism, linearity, and relative potency in bioassay and immunoassay data.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):437-63. PubMed ID: 15920890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Logistic equations effectively model Mammalian cell batch and fed-batch kinetics by logically constraining the fit.
    Goudar CT; Joeris K; Konstantinov KB; Piret JM
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(4):1109-18. PubMed ID: 16080690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the effects of the fixed and varying dispersion parameters of Poisson-gamma models on empirical Bayes estimates.
    Lord D; Park PY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1441-57. PubMed ID: 18606278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a simulated annealing algorithm to fit compartmental models with an application to fractal pharmacokinetics.
    Marsh RE; Riauka TA; McQuarrie SA
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2007; 10(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 17706176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mathematical modelling to centre low tidal volumes following acute lung injury: a study with biologically variable ventilation.
    Graham MR; Haberman CJ; Brewster JF; Girling LG; McManus BM; Mutch WA
    Respir Res; 2005 Jun; 6(1):64. PubMed ID: 15985159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A variant of logistic transfer function in Infomax and a postprocessing procedure for independent component analysis applied to fMRI data.
    Wu X; Yao L; Long ZY; Chen K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 17368793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. POEM: Parameter Optimization using Ensemble Methods: application to target specific scoring functions.
    Antes I; Merkwirth C; Lengauer T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1291-302. PubMed ID: 16180906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose-escalation designs in oncology: ADEPT and the CRM.
    Shu J; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5345-53; discussion 5354-5. PubMed ID: 18752259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radioligand Assay.
    Finney DJ
    Biometrics; 1976 Dec; 32(4):721-40. PubMed ID: 1009221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced parameter estimation methods for noisy SPECT data.
    Wen L; Eberl S; Choi HC; Feng DD; Fulham M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Feb; 89(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 17502121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speeding up evolutionary algorithms through asymmetric mutation operators.
    Doerr B; Hebbinghaus N; Neumann F
    Evol Comput; 2007; 15(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 18021012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.