These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15954247)
21. Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Lussi A; Hellwig E J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):467-71. PubMed ID: 16431009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent and caries detector dye in detection of residual caries in prepared cavities. Akbari M; Ahrari F; Jafari M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):515-20. PubMed ID: 23151702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria. Banerjee A; Kidd EA; Watson TF Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 14579874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of laser fluorescence for differentiating caries dye-stainable versus caries dye-unstainable dentin in carious lesions. Boston DW; Sauble JE Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):351-4. PubMed ID: 16433406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study. Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of caries detector dye in diagnosis of occlusal carious lesions. al-Sehaibany F; White G; Rainey JT J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 9151621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars. Chawla N; Messer LB; Adams GG; Manton DJ Caries Res; 2012; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22508449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical evaluation of DIAGNOdent in detection of occlusal caries in newly erupted noncavitated first permanent molars in caries-active children. Duruturk L; Ciftçi A; Baharoğlu S; Oztuna D Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21913840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth--in vivo study. Novaes TF; Matos R; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Mendes FM Caries Res; 2009; 43(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 19136830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantity of remaining bacteria and cavity size after excavation with FACE, caries detector dye and conventional excavation in vitro. Lennon AM; Attin T; Buchalla W Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17555174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of visual, radiographic, and laser fluorescence methods for detection of occlusal caries. Heinrich-Weltzien R; Weerheijm KL; Kühnisch J; Oehme T; Stösser L ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(2):127-32, 123. PubMed ID: 12515052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of laser fluorescence for detection of occlusal dentinal caries lesions in permanent molars: an in vivo study with total validation of the sample. Abalos C; Herrera M; Jiménez-Planas A; Llamas R Caries Res; 2009; 43(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 19321992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE) compared to conventional method. Lennon AM Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 12877417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating the objectivity of caries removal with a caries detector dye using color evaluation and PCR. Iwami Y; Hayashi N; Yamamoto H; Hayashi M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):749-54. PubMed ID: 17689167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro. Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro ability of a laser fluorescence device in quantifying approximal caries lesions in primary molars. Celiberti P; Leamari VM; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM J Dent; 2010 Aug; 38(8):666-70. PubMed ID: 20470856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of the calibration method of a laser fluorescence device for detecting occlusal caries in primary molars. Braga MM; Mendes FM; Martins CR; Imparato JC Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(5):451-4. PubMed ID: 17036712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of the condition of the adjacent tooth surface on fluorescence measurements for the detection of approximal caries. Lussi A; Zimmerli B; Hellwig E; Jaeggi T Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Dec; 114(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 17184228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]