These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15954250)

  • 1. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
    Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth (II). Subgingival roughness.
    Kocher T; Rosin M; Langenbeck N; Bernhardt O
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Aug; 28(8):723-9. PubMed ID: 11442731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proof of efficacy of different modified sonic scaler inserts used for debridement in furcations--a dummy head trial.
    Kocher T; Rühling A; Herweg M; Plagman HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Jul; 23(7):662-9. PubMed ID: 8841899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subgingival polishing compared to scaling with steel curettes: a clinical pilot study.
    Kocher T; König J; Hansen P; Rühling A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Feb; 28(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 11168746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of manual and ultrasonic instrumentation of cementum surfaces: influence of lateral pressure.
    Gagnot G; Mora F; Poblete MG; Vachey E; Michel JF; Cathelineau G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15119884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new system to detect residual subgingival calculus: in vitro detection limits.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 16489945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of root substance with the Vector-system compared with conventional debridement in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15691344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical subgingival calculus detection with a smart ultrasonic device: a pilot study.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 35(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 18199147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology.
    Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ;
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Root surface instrumentation].
    Kocher T
    Parodontol; 1990 May; 1(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 2100237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments.
    Kocher T; Rodemerk B; Fanghänel J; Meissner G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 15842271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diamond-coated sonic scaler tip. Part II: Loss of substance and alteration of root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Kocher T; Plagmann HC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Oct; 17(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 9497737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.