265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15956325)
1. Evaluation of autoregressive covariance structures for test-day records of Holstein cows: estimates of parameters.
Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jul; 88(7):2632-42. PubMed ID: 15956325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic analysis of milk production traits of polish black and white cattle using large-scale random regression test-day models.
Strabel T; Jamrozik J
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3152-63. PubMed ID: 16840632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of random regression models with Legendre polynomials and linear splines for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holstein cows.
Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J; Misztal I; Sullivan PG
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Sep; 91(9):3627-38. PubMed ID: 18765621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic parameters and responses of linear type, yield traits, and somatic cell scores to divergent selection for predicted transmitting ability for type in Holsteins.
DeGroot BJ; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Marotz EL
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 12146490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic parameters of milking frequency and milk production traits in Canadian Holsteins milked by an automated milking system.
Nixon M; Bohmanova J; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Hand K; Miglior F
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3422-30. PubMed ID: 19528620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
Dechow CD; Norman HD
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic parameters for tunisian holsteins using a test-day random regression model.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Soyeurt H; Ben Gara A; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2008 May; 91(5):2118-26. PubMed ID: 18420643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic analyses of mastitis data using animal threshold models and genetic correlation with production traits.
Hinrichs D; Stamer E; Junge W; Kalm E
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):2260-8. PubMed ID: 15905456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recursive relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins from finite mixture random regression models.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5474-86. PubMed ID: 20965363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level.
Hammami H; Rekik B; Bastin C; Soyeurt H; Bormann J; Stoll J; Gengler N
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4604-12. PubMed ID: 19700723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of multiple-trait finite mixture model to test-day records of milk yield and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins.
Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Oct; 127(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 20831560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Best prediction of yields for long lactations.
Cole JB; Null DJ; Vanraden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Apr; 92(4):1796-810. PubMed ID: 19307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands.
Nauta WJ; Veerkamp RF; Brascamp EW; Bovenhuis H
J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jul; 89(7):2729-37. PubMed ID: 16772592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic and environmental parameters for milk production, udder health, and fertility traits in Mexican Holstein cows.
Montaldo HH; Castillo-Juárez H; Valencia-Posadas M; Cienfuegos-Rivas EG; Ruiz-López FJ
J Dairy Sci; 2010 May; 93(5):2168-75. PubMed ID: 20412932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of daily and lactation yields of milk, fat, and protein using an autoregressive repeatability test day model.
Vasconcelos J; Martins A; Petim-Batista MF; Colaço J; Blake RW; Carvalheira J
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2591-8. PubMed ID: 15328283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Model comparison for genetic evaluation of milk yield in crossbred Holsteins in the tropics.
Chanvijit K; Duangjinda M; Pattarajinda V; Reodecha C
J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 16278512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Method R estimates of additive genetic, dominance genetic, and permanent environmental fraction of variance for yield and health traits of Holsteins.
Van Tassell CP; Misztal I; Varona L
J Dairy Sci; 2000 Aug; 83(8):1873-7. PubMed ID: 10984165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
