311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15956629)
1. Biotechnology products and university-based science.
Sobolski GK
JAMA; 2005 Jun; 293(23):2862; author reply 2863. PubMed ID: 15956629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biotechnology products and university-based science.
Korn D; Heinig SJ
JAMA; 2005 Jun; 293(23):2862-3; author reply 2863. PubMed ID: 15956628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology products and university-based science.
Lempert P
JAMA; 2005 Jun; 293(23):2861-2; author reply 2863. PubMed ID: 15956627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patent rights and the free research. The boundary between basic research and private sector is not longer razor-sharp].
Westerlund L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Sep 26-Oct 2; 102(39):2737. PubMed ID: 16245544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. University-based science and biotechnology products: defining the boundaries of intellectual property.
Kesselheim AS; Avorn J
JAMA; 2005 Feb; 293(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 15713775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patenting basic research: myths and realities.
Kirschenbaum SR
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 5 Suppl():1025-7. PubMed ID: 12403976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem.
Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Obvious to try": a proper patentability standard in the pharmaceutical arts?
Trask AV
Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 76(5):2625-68. PubMed ID: 18546581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting rights to early-stage technology.
Shuster MJ; Su H; Blaug S
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 12776151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Enforcing pharmaceutical and biotech patent rights in China.
Zhang YP; Deng MM
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18997760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception.
Hoffman DC
Cornell Law Rev; 2004 May; 89(4):993-1043. PubMed ID: 15174465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Amgen cholesterol antibody feud could kill key IP rule.
Ratner M
Nat Biotechnol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1118-1119. PubMed ID: 29220019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In search of a compromised solution to the problem arising from patenting biomedical research tools.
Derzko NM
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 2004; 20(2):347-410. PubMed ID: 16493840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biotech patents-business as usual?
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1326. PubMed ID: 19060861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The MTA-rip it up and start again?
Ku K; Henderson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):721-4. PubMed ID: 17621290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Ganske" threatens biotechnology patents worldwide.
Glaser V
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):121. PubMed ID: 9035128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now.
Boettiger S; Bennett AB
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Razing the tollbooths. A call for restricting patents on basic biomedical research.
Stix G
Sci Am; 2003 Apr; 288(4):37. PubMed ID: 12661312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patent fight sparks biological warfare in the drug industry.
Fortune; 2000 Jul; 142(3):40, 42. PubMed ID: 11066662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Patent prosecution of biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents in a changing legal landscape.
Lu DL; Kowalski TJ; Jarecki-Black J
Future Med Chem; 2010 Jan; 2(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 21426040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
