These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15957609)

  • 1. Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 109(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 15957609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing enfant and PowerDiva sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates.
    Ridder WH; Waite BS; Melton TF
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Oct; 129(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 25150841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of acuities determined with the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP).
    Ridder WH; Tong A; Floresca T
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 124(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 22262233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus duration, neural adaptation, and sweep visual evoked potential acuity estimates.
    Ridder WH; McCulloch D; Herbert AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 39(13):2759-68. PubMed ID: 9856787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of Amblyopia Using Sweep VEP Vernier and Grating Acuity.
    Hou C; Good WV; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 59(3):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 29625467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP.
    Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: predicting post-therapy acuity in amblyopes.
    Ridder WH; Rouse MW
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 114(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 17310345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity in children during their periods of visual development.
    Li L; Su Y; Chen CZ; Feng C; Zheng HM; Xing YQ
    Ophthalmologica; 2011; 226(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21811053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract.
    Thompson DA; Møller H; Russell-Eggitt I; Kriss A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 80(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 8942375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.
    Strasser T; Nasser F; Langrová H; Zobor D; Lisowski Ł; Hillerkuss D; Sailer C; Kurtenbach A; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 138(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 30694438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients.
    Bach M; Maurer JP; Wolf ME
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 92(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 18303162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method of extrapolating the sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity.
    Zhou P; Zhao MW; Li XX; Hu XF; Wu X; Niu LJ; Yu WZ; Xu XL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 117(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 17972124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Agreement Between Sweep Visual Evoked Potential Testing and Subjective Visual Acuity.
    Polat OA; Şener H; Çetinkaya Z; Arda H
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct; 53(5):289-293. PubMed ID: 37867963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.
    Polevoy C; Muckle G; Séguin JR; Ouellet E; Saint-Amour D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 28220265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter.
    Kelly JP; Phillips JO; Weiss AH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 133(3):159-169. PubMed ID: 27882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual impairment in children with spastic cerebral palsy measured by psychophysical and electrophysiological grating acuity tests.
    Costa MF; Ventura DF
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2012; 15(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 23030659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of sVEP visual acuity testing in comparison with subjective visual acuity.
    Vesely P
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2015 Dec; 159(4):616-21. PubMed ID: 25690522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age norms for monocular grating acuity measured by sweep-VEP in the first three years of age.
    Salomão SR; Ejzenbaum F; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Pereira JM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 18797653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.