These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15957675)

  • 1. Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.
    Link MW; Mokdad AH
    J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Mar; 66(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 15957675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research.
    McCabe SE; Diez A; Boyd CJ; Nelson TF; Weitzman ER
    Addict Behav; 2006 Sep; 31(9):1619-27. PubMed ID: 16460882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with web, mail, and telephone.
    Link MW; Mokdad AH
    Epidemiology; 2005 Sep; 16(5):701-4. PubMed ID: 16135951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail.
    McCabe SE; Boyd CJ; Couper MP; Crawford S; D'Arcy H
    J Stud Alcohol; 2002 Nov; 63(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 12529076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators.
    Link MW; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR; Osborn L; Mokdad AH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 164(10):1019-25. PubMed ID: 16968861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: a randomized experiment.
    McCabe SE
    J Drug Educ; 2004; 34(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 15468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
    Fowler FJ; Cosenza C; Cripps LA; Edgman-Levitan S; Cleary PD
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 30656646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys.
    Cantuaria ML; Blanes-Vidal V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):238. PubMed ID: 31830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
    McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.
    Beebe TJ; Jacobson RM; Jenkins SM; Lackore KA; Rutten LJF
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3070-3083. PubMed ID: 29355920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of phone versus mail survey methods on the measurement of health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents.
    Erhart M; Wetzel RM; Krügel A; Ravens-Sieberer U
    BMC Public Health; 2009 Dec; 9():491. PubMed ID: 20042099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complementing random-digit-dial telephone surveys with other approaches to collecting sensitive data.
    Galesic M; Tourangeau R; Couper MP
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 17046416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.
    Greenfield TK; Midanik LT; Rogers JD
    Addiction; 2000 Feb; 95(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 10723856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys.
    Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Rogers WH; Chang H; Fanjiang G; Safran DG
    Med Care; 2006 Feb; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16434916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasons for nonresponse in a web-based survey of alcohol involvement among first-year college students.
    Cranford JA; McCabe SE; Boyd CJ; Slayden J; Reed MB; Ketchie JM; Lange JE; Scott MS
    Addict Behav; 2008 Jan; 33(1):206-10. PubMed ID: 17728069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
    Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys.
    Beebe TJ; McRae JA; Harrison PA; Davern ME; Quinlan KB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 15868697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.