These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15957780)

  • 1. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: a comparison of sound-processing strategies.
    Vandali AE; Sucher C; Tsang DJ; McKay CM; Chew JW; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3126-38. PubMed ID: 15957780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.
    Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):713-26. PubMed ID: 11248975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.
    Kovačić D; James CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 23(5):665-680. PubMed ID: 35918501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: effects on pitch ranking.
    Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):392-402. PubMed ID: 22779486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of Mandarin Chinese with cochlear implants using enhanced temporal pitch cues.
    Milczynski M; Chang JE; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 22361414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch Perception With the Temporal Limits Encoder for Cochlear Implants.
    Zhou H; Kan A; Yu G; Guo Z; Zheng N; Meng Q
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():2528-2539. PubMed ID: 36044501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.
    Donaldson GS; Dawson PK; Borden LZ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 21084987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children.
    Hwang CF; Chen HC; Yang CH; Peng JP; Weng CH
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 21982716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
    Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a single channel dedicated to conveying enhanced temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification.
    Hamilton N; Green T; Faulkner A
    Int J Audiol; 2007 May; 46(5):244-53. PubMed ID: 17487672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.