These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter. Jang HS; Lee MH; Park SB Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3347963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial-angular compounding for elastography using beam steering on linear array transducers. Rao M; Chen Q; Shi H; Varghese T Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):618-26. PubMed ID: 16878565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms. Omari EA; Varghese T Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032902. PubMed ID: 24593741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustical characterization of polysaccharide polymers tissue-mimicking materials. Cuccaro R; Musacchio C; Giuliano Albo PA; Troia A; Lago S Ultrasonics; 2015 Feb; 56():210-9. PubMed ID: 24794507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectral and scatterer-size correlation during angular compounding: simulations and experimental studies. Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Varghese T; Gerig AL; Hall TJ Ultrason Imaging; 2006 Oct; 28(4):230-44. PubMed ID: 17521044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method. Samimi K; Varghese T Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using backscattered echoes from multiple sources. Bigelow TA J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1367-73. PubMed ID: 18681622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel power spectrum calculation method using phase-compensation and weighted averaging for the estimation of ultrasound attenuation. Heo SW; Kim H Ultrasonics; 2010 May; 50(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20083291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the spatial autocorrelation function for ultrasound scatterers in isotropic media. Chen JF; Zagzebski JA; Dong F; Madsen EL Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 9608474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the performance of the RF cross correlation and Doppler autocorrelation technique to estimate the mean velocity of simulated ultrasound signals. Hoeks AP; Arts TG; Brands PJ; Reneman RS Ultrasound Med Biol; 1993; 19(9):727-40. PubMed ID: 8134974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation analysis of the beam angle dependence for elastography. Rao M; Varghese T J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):4093-101. PubMed ID: 16838551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonic wave propagation in porous media: determination of acoustic parameters and high frequency limit of the classical models. Leclaire P; Kelders L; Lauriks W; Glorieux C; Thoen J Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 40():139-55. PubMed ID: 10168875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attenuation and backscatter estimation using video signal analysis applied to B-mode images. Knipp BS; Zagzebski JA; Wilson TA; Dong F; Madsen EL Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Jul; 19(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 9447670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro measurement of the frequency-dependent attenuation in cancellous bone between 0.2 and 2 MHz. Chaffaï S; Padilla F; Berger G; Laugier P J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1281-9. PubMed ID: 11008828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]