BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15958240)

  • 21. Bond strengths of glass ionomer restoratives to primary vs permanent dentin.
    Thean HP; Mok BY; Chew CL
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(2):112-6, 82. PubMed ID: 10826046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of APF Minute-Foam on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of high-viscosity glass ionomers.
    García-Godoy F; García-Godoy A; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12762603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials: an in vitro study with teeth and replicas.
    Costa AT; Konrath F; Dedavid B; Weber JB; de Oliveira MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 19279975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hardness of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials as a function of depth and time.
    Roberts HW; Berzins DW; Charlton DG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 19689726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
    Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of some properties of two fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Lassila LV; Tezvergil A; Lahdenperä M; Alander P; Shinya A; Shinya A; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 16040441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC).
    Moshaverinia A; Ansari S; Moshaverinia M; Roohpour N; Darr JA; Rehman I
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Mar; 4(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 17921077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect acidic and alkaline/heat treatments on the bond strength of different luting cements to commercially pure titanium.
    Fawzy AS; El-Askary FS
    J Dent; 2009 Apr; 37(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 19167146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study.
    Setty JV; Singh S; Subba Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):55-69. PubMed ID: 14700337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Wang L; Sakai VT; Kawai ES; Buzalaf MA; Atta MT
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fluoride release from restorative materials coated with an adhesive.
    Miranda LA; Weidlich P; Samuel SM; Maltz M
    Braz Dent J; 2002; 13(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11870961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Part 1: Properties.
    Sidhu SK; Watson TF
    Dent Update; 1995 Dec; 22(10):429-32. PubMed ID: 8948190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer cements bound to mineral trioxide aggregate.
    Yesilyurt C; Yildirim T; Taşdemir T; Kusgoz A
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1381-3. PubMed ID: 19801234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bioactive glass-ionomer cement with potential therapeutic function to dentin capping mineralization.
    Xie D; Zhao J; Weng Y; Park JG; Jiang H; Platt JA
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Oct; 116(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 18821992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility.
    De Caluwé T; Vercruysse CW; Ladik I; Convents R; Declercq H; Martens LC; Verbeeck RM
    Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):e186-e203. PubMed ID: 28196604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterization of the mineral trioxide aggregate-resin modified glass ionomer cement interface in different setting conditions.
    Eid AA; Komabayashi T; Watanabe E; Shiraishi T; Watanabe I
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1126-9. PubMed ID: 22794220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.
    Dean JA; Bullard G; Long RW; Moore BK; McDonald SM
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2004; 83(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15266732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.