These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

690 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15958240)

  • 61. Differential bonds degradation of two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary and permanent teeth.
    Marquezan M; Fagundes TC; Toledano M; Navarro MF; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 19631441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Flexural strength and morphological characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer containing bioactive glass.
    Mousavinasab SM; Khoroushi M; Keshani F; Hashemi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 22186689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Electron probe microanalysis of ion exchange of selected elements between dentine and adhesive restorative materials.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Jun; 52(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 17687959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The constitution, physical properties and biocompatibility of modified accelerated cement.
    Camilleri J; Montesin FE; Juszczyk AS; Papaioannou S; Curtis RV; Donald FM; Ford TR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 17659330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. In vitro mechanical stimulation facilitates stress dissipation and sealing ability at the conventional glass ionomer cement-dentin interface.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Cabello I; Toledano-Osorio M; Aguilera FS
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():61-69. PubMed ID: 29653140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of in vitro secondary caries using confocal laser scanning microscope and X-ray analytical microscope.
    Okuda M; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 12967074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. An in vivo evaluation of bonding ability of comprehensive antibacterial adhesive system incorporating MDPB.
    Imazato S; Tay FR; Kaneshiro AV; Takahashi Y; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 16469372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of the interfacial work of fracture of glass-ionomer cements bonded to dentin.
    Cheetham JJ; Palamara JE; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jan; 29():427-37. PubMed ID: 24189324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth. Substrate treatment and luting agent effects.
    Borges AF; Correr GM; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S; Sobrinho LC; Rontani RM
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 16427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results.
    Duke ES; Trevino DF
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1998; 77(3):13-6, 25. PubMed ID: 10530103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of artificial saliva and APF gel on the surface roughness of newer glass ionomer cements.
    Yip HK; To WM; Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 15646222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Interfacial failure of a dental cement composite bonded to glass substrates.
    Zhou J; Huang M; Sagnang F; Soboyejo WO
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jun; 22(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 16229885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Interaction of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements with moist dentine.
    Yiu CK; Tay FR; King NM; Pashley DH; Carvalho RM; Carrilho MR
    J Dent; 2004 Sep; 32(7):521-30. PubMed ID: 15304297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effect of ytterbium fluoride and barium sulphate nanoparticles on the reactivity and strength of a glass-ionomer cement.
    Prentice LH; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):746-51. PubMed ID: 16364424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.
    Naasan MA; Watson TF
    Am J Dent; 1998 Feb; 11(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 9823085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Abrasion resistance of restorative glass-ionomer cements with a light-cured surface coating.
    Hotta M; Hirukawa H
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 8008609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.