These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15959632)

  • 1. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal types: key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance.
    Jefferson Y
    J Gen Orthod; 1996 Jun; 7(2):7-25. PubMed ID: 9508852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial attractiveness and abnormality of nasal reconstruction patients and controls assessed by laypersons.
    Moolenburgh SE; Mureau MA; Hofer SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Jun; 61(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 18222114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.
    Kokich VO; Kokich VG; Kiyak HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16905057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Face perception in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and patients with severe Class III malocclusion compared to controls.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Kochel J; Boehm H; Linz C; Klammert U; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 39(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 20580240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.