These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15960094)
21. Human factors approach to evaluate the user interface of physiologic monitoring. Fidler R; Bond R; Finlay D; Guldenring D; Gallagher A; Pelter M; Drew B; Hu X J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(6):982-7. PubMed ID: 26375330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment. Baldus T; Patterson P Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 18295185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of input device and motion type on a cursor-positioning task. Yau YJ; Hwang SL; Chao CJ Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 18459358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Revisiting the impact of mobile phone screen size on user comprehension of health information. Alghamdi E; Yunus F; Househ M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():217-20. PubMed ID: 25000055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The design of a visual display for the presentation of statistical quality control information to operators on the plant floor. D'Souza ME; Greenstein JS Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 10774132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job. Rogers WA; Fisk AD; McLaughlin AC; Pak R Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):271-88. PubMed ID: 16170938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Information structure and the relative efficacy of tables and graphs. Meyer J; Shamo MK; Gopher D Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):570-87. PubMed ID: 10774128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing design features of virtual keyboards for text entry. O'Brien MA; Rogers WA; Fisk AD; Richman M Hum Factors; 2008 Aug; 50(4):680-98. PubMed ID: 18767526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increasing productivity and reducing errors through usability analysis: a case study and recommendations. Johnson CM; Johnson T; Zhang J Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():394-8. PubMed ID: 11079912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usability and efficiency. The HELIOS approach to development of user interfaces. Borälv E; Göransson B; Olsson E; Sandblad B Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Dec; 45 Suppl():S47-64. PubMed ID: 7882675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. Rydström A; Broström R; Bengtsson P Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 21924702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Touchscreen task efficiency and learnability in an electronic medical record at the point-of-care. Lewis ZL; Douglas GP; Monaco V; Crowley RS Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):101-5. PubMed ID: 20841658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transfer of control system interface solutions from other domains to the thermal power industry. Bligård LO; Andersson J; Osvalder AL Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2859-65. PubMed ID: 22317152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breadth, depth and visibility: a design guide for information architectures aimed at elderly users. Bruun A; Hahn C; Voight B; Schultz M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():103-5. PubMed ID: 23823390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults. Murata A; Iwase H Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):767-76. PubMed ID: 16553065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Horrey WJ; Wickens CD Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer aided techniques for crew station design: work-space organizer-WORG; workstation layout generator-WOLAG. Pulat BM; Grice AE Int J Man Mach Stud; 1985 Nov; 23(5):443-57. PubMed ID: 11541076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the MR simulation approach for evaluating the effects of immersion on visual analysis of volume data. Laha B; Bowman DA; Schiffbauer JD IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Apr; 19(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 23428436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Thumb motor performance varies by movement orientation, direction, and device size during single-handed mobile phone use. Trudeau MB; Udtamadilok T; Karlson AK; Dennerlein JT Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22409102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]