BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15960096)

  • 1. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
    Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory localization in the horizontal plane with single and double hearing protection.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD; McKinley RL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Sep; 74(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 14503671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Better protection from blasts without sacrificing situational awareness.
    Killion MC; Monroe T; Drambarean V
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50 Suppl 1():S38-45. PubMed ID: 21288067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of hearing protectors on auditory localization: evidence from audio-visual target acquisition.
    Bolia RS; McKinley RL
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2000; 6(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 11082547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining attenuation of impulse noise with an electrical equivalent of a hearing protection device.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 23498707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
    Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
    J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Hearing and Head Protection on the Localization of Tonal and Broadband Reverse Alarms.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Marleau C; Cadieux MF; Laprise-Girard K; Gula E; Carroll V; Bibeau M; Nélisse H
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 33596712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an auditory situation awareness test battery for advanced hearing protectors and TCAPS: detection subtest of DRILCOM (detection-recognition/identification-localization-communication).
    Lee K; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27905220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.