118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15961111)
1. MEP recruitment curves in multiple sclerosis and hereditary spastic paraplegia.
Jørgensen LM; Nielsen JE; Ravnborg M
J Neurol Sci; 2005 Oct; 237(1-2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15961111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Post-exercise facilitation and depression of motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation: a study in multiple sclerosis.
Perretti A; Balbi P; Orefice G; Trojano L; Marcantonio L; Brescia-Morra V; Ascione S; Manganelli F; Conte G; Santoro L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 115(9):2128-33. PubMed ID: 15294215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motor evoked potential: a reliable and objective measure to document the functional consequences of multiple sclerosis? Relation to disability and MRI.
Kalkers NF; Strijers RL; Jasperse MM; Neacsu V; Geurts JJ; Barkhof F; Polman CH; Stam CJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 17398151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans.
Tazoe T; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T; Endoh T; Komiyama T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 17449319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanomyographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation from biceps brachii and during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on extensor carpi radialis.
Reza MF; Ikoma K; Chuma T; Mano Y
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Dec; 149(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16026847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between disability and transcranial magnetic stimulation abnormalities in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Kale N; Agaoglu J; Onder G; Tanik O
J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1439-42. PubMed ID: 19695880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Changes of somatosensory and transcranial magnetic stimulation motor evoked potentials in experimental spinal cord injury].
Hou Y; Nie L; Liu LH; Shao J; Yuan YJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 88(11):773-7. PubMed ID: 18683688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the recruitment of excitation and inhibition in the motor cortex differ?
Werhahn KJ; Behrang-Nia M; Bott MC; Klimpe S
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 24(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 17912067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Sensitivity of motor evoked potentials in detecting cortico-spinal lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis].
Gómez-Fernández L; Minou-Báez M; Cabrera-Gómez JA
Rev Neurol; 1999 Feb 16-28; 28(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 10714312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and evoked pressure curves (EPC) from the urethral compressive musculature (UCM) by functional magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and patients with neurogenic incontinence.
Schmid DM; Curt A; Hauri D; Schurch B
Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 15616965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cortico-diaphragmatic pathway involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: neurophysiological, respiratory and clinical considerations.
Miscio G; Gukov B; Pisano F; Mazzini L; Baudo S; Salvadori A; Mauro A
J Neurol Sci; 2006 Dec; 251(1-2):10-6. PubMed ID: 17078971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of low-frequency whole-body vibration on motor-evoked potentials in healthy men.
Mileva KN; Bowtell JL; Kossev AR
Exp Physiol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 18658234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical and magnetic repetitive transcranial stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.
Gilio F; Iacovelli E; Frasca V; Gabriele M; Giacomelli E; De Lena C; Cipriani AM; Inghilleri M
Neurosci Lett; 2009 May; 455(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19429094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central motor conduction in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy and hereditary spastic paraplegia.
Cruz Martínez A; Tejada J
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Sep; 39(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 10499202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task-specific changes in motor evoked potentials of lower limb muscles after different training interventions.
Beck S; Taube W; Gruber M; Amtage F; Gollhofer A; Schubert M
Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1179():51-60. PubMed ID: 17889840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulus-response characteristics of motor evoked potentials and silent periods in proximal and distal upper-extremity muscles.
van Kuijk AA; Anker LC; Pasman JW; Hendriks JC; van Elswijk G; Geurts AC
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):574-83. PubMed ID: 18396413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing cortical silent period: optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction.
Säisänen L; Pirinen E; Teitti S; Könönen M; Julkunen P; Määttä S; Karhu J
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 18243329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tactile-associated recruitment of the cervical cord is altered in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Agosta F; Valsasina P; Caputo D; Stroman PW; Filippi M
Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1542-8. PubMed ID: 18061484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing the relation between corticospinal output and muscle force during voluntary contractions.
Gelli F; Del Santo F; Popa T; Mazzocchio R; Rossi A
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(11):3469-75. PubMed ID: 17553016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-specific depression of the soleus H-reflex after cocontraction training of antagonistic ankle muscles.
Perez MA; Lundbye-Jensen J; Nielsen JB
J Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 98(6):3677-87. PubMed ID: 17942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
