These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15961214)

  • 1. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during Cesarean section.
    Levy R; Chernomoretz T; Appelman Z; Levin D; Or Y; Hagay ZJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15961214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods.
    Fasubaa OB; Ezechi OC; Orji EO; Ogunniyi SO; Akindele ST; Loto OM; Okogbo FO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 12521457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction.
    Chopra S; Bagga R; Keepanasseril A; Jain V; Kalra J; Suri V
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(10):1163-6. PubMed ID: 19925377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with head-pushing and head-pulling methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery.
    Bastani P; Pourabolghasem S; Abbasalizadeh F; Motvalli L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jul; 118(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22521199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of "push" and "pull" methods for impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean delivery.
    Veisi F; Zangeneh M; Malekkhosravi S; Rezavand N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jul; 118(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 22541809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reverse breech extraction for cesarean section.
    Iffy L; Apuzzio JJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):126; author reply 127. PubMed ID: 16387408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing in cesarean section for obstructed labor. A comparative study in Yemen.
    Frass KA; Al Eryani A; Al-Harazi AH
    Saudi Med J; 2011 Dec; 32(12):1261-6. PubMed ID: 22159381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical significance of the floating fetal head in nulliparous women in labor.
    Debby A; Rotmensch S; Girtler O; Sadan O; Golan A; Glezerman M
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12611093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery.
    Berhan Y; Berhan A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Feb; 124(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 24290068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lenz F; Kimmich N; Zimmermann R; Kreft M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 30917799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breech presentation: evolution of management.
    Ghosh MK
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Feb; 50(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 15755047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.
    Zeck W; Walcher W; Lang U
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 66(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18230911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia.
    Blickstein I
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 15576265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study.
    Jonsdottir F; Henriksen L; Secher NJ; Maaløe N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25283062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Term-breech presentation: predictive factors of cesarean section for vaginal-birth failure].
    Broche DE; Ramanah R; Collin A; Mangin M; Vidal C; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):483-92. PubMed ID: 18584974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Term breech delivery. Early and late complications.
    Bistoletti P; Nisell H; Palme C; Lagercrantz H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1981; 60(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 7246082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reverse breech extraction versus the standard approach of pushing the impacted fetal head up through the vagina in caesarean section for obstructed labour: A randomised controlled trial.
    Nooh AM; Abdeldayem HM; Ben-Affan O
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 May; 37(4):459-463. PubMed ID: 28141942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes associated with cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery at a university hospital.
    Hopkins LM; Esakoff T; Noah MS; Moore DH; Sawaya GF; Laros RK
    J Perinatol; 2007 Mar; 27(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 17036031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [External version from breech position to head presentation near term].
    Ketscher KD; Retzke U; Kindt J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 3564757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004.
    Nassar N; Roberts CL; Cameron CA; Peat B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1231-8. PubMed ID: 17068683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.