BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15961569)

  • 1. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical facial height and proportions of face in Hausa - Fulani children in Northern Nigeria.
    Utomi IL
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15254569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facially generated occlusal vertical dimension.
    Mack MR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Dec; 18(12):1183-6, 1188, 1190 passim; quiz 119. PubMed ID: 9656843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure to 'ideal' facial images reduces facial satisfaction: an experimental study.
    Newton JT; Minhas G
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 16262608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Stanisić-Sinobad D; Marković D; Stojanović L
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 18756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divine proportions in the growing face.
    Ferring V; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18929263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal types: key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance.
    Jefferson Y
    J Gen Orthod; 1996 Jun; 7(2):7-25. PubMed ID: 9508852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on face height.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Ormianer Z; Dvori S; Shifman A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 12170849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness.
    Edler R; Agarwal P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Jun; 28(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 16415084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An orthodontic view of dentofacial esthetics.
    Morris W
    Compendium; 1994 Mar; 15(3):378, 380-2, 384 passim; quiz 390. PubMed ID: 8205591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.