317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15961569)
21. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Perception of facial profile attractiveness of lower anterior face height in orthodontic treatment seeking people].
Pham M; Wang Y; Wang W; Zhou C; Guo C; Bao B
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 31(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 23991578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A genetic study of anteroposterior and vertical facial proportions using model-fitting.
Savoye I; Loos R; Carels C; Derom C; Vlietinck R
Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 9770105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A proportional analysis of the soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion.
Lundström A; Forsberg CM; Peck S; McWilliam J
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(2):127-33; discussion 133-4. PubMed ID: 1626746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people.
Varlik SK; Demirbaş E; Orhan M
Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1159-64. PubMed ID: 20677970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Facial beauty--establishing a universal standard.
Jefferson Y
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2004; 15(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 15085778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an epidemiological survey on young Italian adults.
Senna A; Abbenante D; Tremolizzo L; Campus G; Strohmenger L
BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17032444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cephalometric study of elderly with nearly intact dental arches.
Shimizu T; Motegi E; Nomura M; Kaneko Y; Takeuchi F; Yamaguchi T; Miyazaki H; Harazaki M; Hirai M; Kurihara S; Yamaguchi H
Gerodontology; 2006 Mar; 23(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16433644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Change in cranio-cervical angulation following orthognathic surgery.
Savjani D; Wertheim D; Edler R
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 15947227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dentoalveolar compensation in subjects with vertical skeletal dysplasia.
Kuitert R; Beckmann S; van Loenen M; Tuinzing B; Zentner A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 16679205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
