These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15961596)

  • 41. Analysis of dentists' attitudes towards risks in oral radiology.
    Svenson B; Söderfeldt B; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9084264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparative study of radiographic quality with five periapical techniques in general dental practice.
    Rushton VE; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 8181658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of dental schools in future film selection.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW
    N Y State Dent J; 1991; 57(7):41-3. PubMed ID: 1923147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The acceptability of five periapical radiographic techniques to dentists and patients.
    Rushton VE; Horner K
    Br Dent J; 1994 Nov; 177(9):325-31. PubMed ID: 7980980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lonizing radiation regulations and the dental practitioner: 3. Quality assurance in dental radiography.
    Rout J; Brown J
    Dent Update; 2012 Jun; 39(5):334-6, 338-9. PubMed ID: 22852511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical justification of dental radiology in adult patients: a review of the literature.
    Martínez Beneyto Y; Alcaráz Banos M; Pérez Lajarin L; Rushton VE
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 May; 12(3):E244-51. PubMed ID: 17468724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is dosimetry still a necessity in current dental practice?
    Reddy SS; Rakesh N; Chauhan P; Clint JB; Sharma S
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):911-6. PubMed ID: 26619179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The status of Spain's dental practices following the European Union directive concerning radiological installations.
    Alcaraz M; Martínez-Beneyto Y; Perez L; Jodar S; Velasco E; Canteras M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 15472664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The impact of quality control on radiography in general dental practice.
    Rushton VE; Horner K
    Br Dent J; 1995 Oct; 179(7):254-61. PubMed ID: 7577179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Some factors affecting the standards of radiography in general dental practice.
    Szymkowiak LE; Sarll DW; Horner K
    Br Dent J; 1995 Sep; 179(5):168-74. PubMed ID: 7546969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
    Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative study of three periapical radiographic techniques for endodontic working length estimation.
    Kazzi D; Horner K; Qualtrough AC; Martinez-Beneyto Y; Rushton VE
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):526-31. PubMed ID: 17459119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene.
    White SC; Mallya SM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 22376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Causes of excessive bitewing exposure: results of a survey regarding radiographic equipment in New York.
    Button TM; Moore WC; Goren AD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Apr; 87(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 10225637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.