118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15961598)
1. A precise receptor-positioning device for subtraction radiography, based on cross-arch stabilization.
Couture RA; Dixon DA; Hildebolt CF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 15961598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alveolar bone measurement precision for phosphor-plate images.
Hildebolt CF; Couture R; Garcia NM; Dixon D; Miley DD; Shannon W; Mueller C; Langenwalter E; Spearie CA; Civitelli R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e96-107. PubMed ID: 19716499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of bone height measurements made on serial radiographs.
Hausmann E; Allen K
J Periodontol; 1997 Sep; 68(9):839-41. PubMed ID: 9379327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes.
Griffiths GS; Brägger U; Fourmousis I; Sterne JA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 9446977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometric alignment and chromatic calibration of serial radiographic images.
Dornier C; Dorsaz-Brossa L; Thévenaz P; Casagni F; Brochut P; Mombelli A; Vallée J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 15533974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective study of digital subtraction technique to detect sclerotic changes in alveolar bone on intraoral radiographs of bisphosphonate-treated patients.
Zaman MU; Nakamoto T; Tanimoto K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130242. PubMed ID: 24404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ROI-based image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 16545718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture.
Benn DK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Aug; 19(3):97-104. PubMed ID: 2088789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12076050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of changes in dental and bone radiographic densities in the presence of different soft-tissue simulators using pixel intensity and digital subtraction analyses.
de Molon RS; Batitucci RG; Spin-Neto R; Paquier GM; Sakakura CE; Tosoni GM; Scaf G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130235. PubMed ID: 24005061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an opto-electronic positioning device for serial direct digital images of oral structures.
Morea C; Langlotz F; Scheer C; Bürgin W; Nolte LP; Lang NP; Brägger U
J Periodontal Res; 2000 Aug; 35(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10983883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study.
Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 9574959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.
Rudolph DJ; White SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jun; 65(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 3041341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A positioning device for oral paralleling technique].
Zhang W; Zhang G; Ma X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Jul; 32(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 10680504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
