BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15962667)

  • 1. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
    Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
    Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
    Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
    Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Software for reading and grading diabetic retinopathy: Aravind Diabetic Retinopathy Screening 3.0.
    Perumalsamy N; Prasad NM; Sathya S; Ramasamy K
    Diabetes Care; 2007 Sep; 30(9):2302-6. PubMed ID: 17507695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonmydriatic digital retinal images for determining diabetic retinopathy.
    Tanterdtham J; Singalavanija A; Namatra C; Trinavarat A; Rodanant N; Bamroongsuk P; Thoongsuwan S; Euasobhon W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):508-12. PubMed ID: 17427528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
    Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
    Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
    Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
    Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
    Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
    Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
    Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
    Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
    Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential of digital monochrome images versus colour slides in telescreening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Johansen MA; Fossen K; Norum J; Christoffersen T; Oritsland H; Haga D; Hasvold P; Bellika JG; Knarvik U; Pedersen S
    J Telemed Telecare; 2008; 14(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 18318926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fundus photography for the screening for diabetic retinopathy].
    Massin P; Marre M
    Diabetes Metab; 2002 Apr; 28(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 11976569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
    Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.