401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15962667)
21. Fred Hollows lecture: digital screening for eye disease.
Constable IJ; Yogesan K; Eikelboom R; Barry C; Cuypers M
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 28(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 10981779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study.
Marcus DM; Brooks SE; Ulrich LD; Bassi FH; Laird M; Johnson M; Newman C
Ophthalmology; 1998 Oct; 105(10):1907-14. PubMed ID: 9787363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Beyond retinal screening: digital imaging in the assessment and follow-up of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Kerr D; Cavan DA; Jennings B; Dunnington C; Gold D; Crick M
Diabet Med; 1998 Oct; 15(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 9796890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
George LD; Halliwell M; Hill R; Aldington SJ; Lusty J; Dunstan F; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9545127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Romero P; Sagarra R; Ferrer J; Fernández-Ballart J; Baget M
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 20189672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The tele-screening model for diabetic retinopathy: evaluating the influence of mydriasis on the gradability of a single-field 45 degrees digital fundus image.
Raman R; Rani PK; Mahajan S; Paul P; Gnanamoorthy P; Krishna MS; Sharma T
Telemed J E Health; 2007 Oct; 13(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 17999621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera.
Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; McAllister IL; Tay-Kearney ML
Telemed J; 2000; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10957734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy: response to Ahmed et al.
Raman R; Rani PK; Sharma T
Diabetes Care; 2007 May; 30(5):e47. PubMed ID: 17468375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of modified portable digital camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy.
Chalam KV; Brar VS; Keshavamurthy R
Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 42(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 19478543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How high is the non-response rate of patients referred for eye examination from diabetic screening camps?
Agarwal S; Mahajan S; Rani PK; Raman R; Paul PG; Kumaramanickavel G; Sharma T
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 12(6):393-4. PubMed ID: 16283991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus D; McDonald HR
Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
