These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15963607)

  • 21. Recent developments in assessment of long-term radionuclide behavior in the geosphere-biosphere subsystem.
    Smith GM; Smith KL; Kowe R; Pérez-Sánchez D; Thorne M; Thiry Y; Read D; Molinero J
    J Environ Radioact; 2014 May; 131():89-109. PubMed ID: 24238917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A practical profile of integrated safety assessment of near-surface disposal of radwaste at PINSTECH.
    Jan F; Ahmad SS; Hasany SM; Aslam M
    J Radiol Prot; 2007 Jun; 27(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 17664662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Climate change and landscape development in post-closure safety assessment of solid radioactive waste disposal: Results of an initiative of the IAEA.
    Lindborg T; Thorne M; Andersson E; Becker J; Brandefelt J; Cabianca T; Gunia M; Ikonen ATK; Johansson E; Kangasniemi V; Kautsky U; Kirchner G; Klos R; Kowe R; Kontula A; Kupiainen P; Lahdenperä AM; Lord NS; Lunt DJ; Näslund JO; Nordén M; Norris S; Pérez-Sánchez D; Proverbio A; Riekki K; Rübel A; Sweeck L; Walke R; Xu S; Smith G; Pröhl G
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Mar; 183():41-53. PubMed ID: 29291453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contribution to a more realistic approach in assessing the release of C-14 from low-level radioactive waste repositories.
    Bracke G; Müller W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19022527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches.
    Walke RC; Kirchner G; Xu S; Dverstorp B
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():50-8. PubMed ID: 26111499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Waste disposal and the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection - challenges for radioecology and environmental radiation protection.
    Larsson CM
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1053-7. PubMed ID: 19643515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A research and development roadmap to support applications of the enhanced BIOMASS methodology.
    Thorne MC; Lindborg T; Brown J; Ikonen ATK; Smith GM; Smith K; Walke R
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Apr; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35467550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A biosphere modeling methodology for dose assessments of the potential Yucca Mountain deep geological high level radioactive waste repository.
    Watkins BM; Smith GM; Little RH; Kessler J
    Health Phys; 1999 Apr; 76(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 10086596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison between the example reference biosphere model ERB 2B and a process-based model: simulation of a natural release scenario.
    Almahayni T
    J Environ Radioact; 2014 Dec; 138():279-88. PubMed ID: 25306104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Illustrative assessment of human health issues arising from the potential release of chemotoxic substances from a generic geological disposal facility for radioactive waste.
    Wilson JC; Thorne MC; Towler G; Norris S
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):411-30. PubMed ID: 22089948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial and multi-criteria decision analysis-based methodology for landfill site selection in growing urban regions.
    Ersoy H; Bulut F
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Aug; 27(5):489-500. PubMed ID: 19423606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk-informed radioactive waste classification and reclassification.
    Croff AG
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):449-60. PubMed ID: 17033455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The significance of agricultural vs. natural ecosystem pathways in temperate climates in assessments of long-term radiological impact.
    Kłos R; Albrecht A
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(2):137-69. PubMed ID: 15960997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of strategic environmental assessment in the site selection process for a radioactive waste disposal facility in Slovenia.
    Dermol U; Kontić B
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 92(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 20846780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of radioactive waste storage.
    Dellamano JC; Sordi GM
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2 Suppl):S27-36. PubMed ID: 17228185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Waste disposal technology transfer matching requirement clusters for waste disposal facilities in China.
    Dorn T; Nelles M; Flamme S; Jinming C
    Waste Manag; 2012 Nov; 32(11):2177-84. PubMed ID: 22770778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid wastes: development of the WASTED model.
    Diaz R; Warith M
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(8):886-901. PubMed ID: 16153816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experience in radiological risk assessment of a surface waste disposal facility in Chişinău, Moldova.
    Xu S; Kłos R; Dverstorp B; Sandberg V; Stark K; Gisca I
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jan; 42(1):. PubMed ID: 34492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling the long-term leaching behavior of (137)Cs, (60)Co, and (152,154)Eu radionuclides from cement-clay matrices.
    Abdel Rahman RO; Zaki AA; El-Kamash AM
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 145(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 17178435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Household waste disposal in Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia.
    Tadesse T; Ruijs A; Hagos F
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(10):2003-12. PubMed ID: 17936609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.