120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15964167)
21. Effect of bone mineral particles on the porosity of bone cement.
Kim YS; Kang YH; Kim JK; Park JB
Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 7920193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of three methods of gluteal muscle attachment to an allograft/endoprosthetic composite in a canine model.
Pluhar GE; Heiner JP; Manley PA; Bogdanske JJ; Vanderby R; Markel MD
J Orthop Res; 2000 Jan; 18(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10716279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Incorporation of cortical allograft: a biomechanical study].
Tang T; Dai K; Gu D
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 36(5):272-4. PubMed ID: 11825386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gene expression at graft-host interfaces of cortical bone allografts and autografts.
Virolainen P; Vuorio E; Aro HT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):144-9. PubMed ID: 8242922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic, biodegradable impaction graft substitute.
Lutton C; Wheatley D; Wilson L; Van der Velden W; Crawford R; Goss B
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Nov; 95(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 20632400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impaction of cancellous bone grafts impairs osteoconduction in titanium chambers.
Tägil M; Aspenberg P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):231-8. PubMed ID: 9678052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of impaction grafting: the when and how.
Haddad FS; Rayan F
Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [An experimental study of the process of bony ingrowth into inorganic bone-particle impregnated bone cement].
Dai KR
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Oct; 30(10):588-9, 635. PubMed ID: 1306789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A surgical technique for the prevention of femoral lysis in cement total hip arthroplasty.
Sarmiento A; Latta LL
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 19439126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cement oscillation increases interlock strength at the cement-bone interface, with commentary.
Wang Y; Han P; Gu W; Shi Z; Li D; Wang C
Orthopedics; 2009 May; 32(5):325; discussion 325. PubMed ID: 19472963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cells seeded on MBG scaffold survive impaction grafting technique: Potential application of cell-seeded biomaterials for revision arthroplasty.
Mushipe MT; Chen X; Jennings D; Li G
J Orthop Res; 2006 Mar; 24(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 16453344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do.
Paprosky WG; Sporer SS; Murphy BP
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):111-5. PubMed ID: 17570291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases.
Nelissen RG; Bauer TW; Weidenhielm LR; LeGolvan DP; Mikhail WE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Mar; 77(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 7890790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improvement of the long-term adhesive strength between bone cement and bone in cemented cup arthroplasty: ex-vivo study.
Mumme T; Gravius S; Andereya S; Marx R; Wirtz DC; Müller-Rath R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 17492454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Grafting for periprosthetic femoral fractures: strut, impaction or femoral replacement.
Tsiridis E; Spence G; Gamie Z; El Masry MA; Giannoudis PV
Injury; 2007 Jun; 38(6):688-97. PubMed ID: 17466991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhances the initial stability of cemented cups: experiments using a synthetic acetabular model.
Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 16752283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
