195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15965171)
1. Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis.
Morgan JE; Sheen NJ; North RV; Choong Y; Ansari E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):879-84. PubMed ID: 15965171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation.
Chan HH; Ong DN; Kong YX; O'Neill EC; Pandav SS; Coote MA; Crowston JG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):936-44. PubMed ID: 24508161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera.
Parkin B; Shuttleworth G; Costen M; Davison C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Nov; 85(11):1347-51. PubMed ID: 11673304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and a digital nonmydriatic retinal camera in assessing area cup-to-disc ratio.
Lamoureux EL; Lo K; Ferraro JG; Constantinou M; Keeffe JE; Müller A; Taylor HR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jan; 47(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 16384949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma.
Varma R; Steinmann WC; Scott IU
Ophthalmology; 1992 Feb; 99(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 1553210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital stereoscopic analysis of the optic disc: evaluation of a teaching program.
Sheen NJ; Morgan JE; Poulsen JL; North RV
Ophthalmology; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1873-9. PubMed ID: 15465549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of a new optic disc grading software for use in clinical and epidemiological research.
Tham YC; Cheung CY; Wong TY; Baskaran M; Liu J; Lee BH; Yin F; Wong DW; Wang JJ; Mitchell P; Aung T; Cheng CY
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 41(9):842-52. PubMed ID: 23566165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography.
Hatch WV; Trope GE; Buys YM; Macken P; Etchells EE; Flanagan JG
J Glaucoma; 1999 Apr; 8(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10209725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination of glaucomatous optic neuropathy by digital stereoscopic analysis.
Morgan JE; Sheen NJ; North RV; Goyal R; Morgan S; Ansari E; Wild JM
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):855-62. PubMed ID: 15878066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (Discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph.
Sung VC; Bhan A; Vernon SA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 86(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 11815347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of the inferior>superior>nasal>temporal neuroretinal rim area rule for diagnosing glaucomatous optic disc damage.
Morgan JE; Bourtsoukli I; Rajkumar KN; Ansari E; Cunliffe IA; North RV; Wild JM
Ophthalmology; 2012 Apr; 119(4):723-30. PubMed ID: 22365059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography.
Correnti AJ; Wollstein G; Price LL; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2003 Aug; 110(8):1499-505. PubMed ID: 12917163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.
Garway-Heath DF; Poinoosawmy D; Wollstein G; Viswanathan A; Kamal D; Fontana L; Hitchings RA
Br J Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 83(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 10340972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability indices for drawing scanning laser ophthalmoscope optic disc contour lines with and without the aid of optic disc photographs.
Watkins RJ; Broadway DC
J Glaucoma; 2005 Oct; 14(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 16148582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital versus film stereo-photography for assessment of the optic nerve head in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.
Hasanreisoglu M; Priel E; Naveh L; Lusky M; Weinberger D; Benjamini Y; Gaton DD
J Glaucoma; 2013 Mar; 22(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 21946551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating vertical cup:disc ratio.
Jayasundera T; Danesh-Meyer HV; Donaldson M; Gamble G
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 15932529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A morphological study of neuroretinal rim for different types of optic disc in normal eyes and early glaucoma].
Xu L; Xia C; Yang H; Li J
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 38(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12139806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements.
Shuttleworth GN; Khong CH; Diamond JP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Apr; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 10729299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized optic disc analysis with adjunct stereoscopic viewing of disc photographs.
Hong YJ; Shin DH
Yonsei Med J; 1990 Dec; 31(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 2077760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What optic disc parameters are most accurately assessed using the direct ophthalmoscope?
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I
Eye (Lond); 2001 Jun; 15(Pt 3):283-7. PubMed ID: 11450721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
