These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15965264)

  • 1. Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.
    Llopart A; Lachaise D; Coyne JA
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 15965264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divergence between Drosophila santomea and allopatric or sympatric populations of D. yakuba using paralogous amylase genes and migration scenarios along the Cameroon volcanic line.
    Cariou ML; Silvain JF; Daubin V; Da Lage JL; Lachaise D
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Mar; 10(3):649-60. PubMed ID: 11298976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetics of a difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.
    Llopart A; Elwyn S; Lachaise D; Coyne JA
    Evolution; 2002 Nov; 56(11):2262-77. PubMed ID: 12487356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential adaptive introgression of the mitochondrial genome in Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.
    Llopart A; Herrig D; Brud E; Stecklein Z
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Mar; 23(5):1124-36. PubMed ID: 24460929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group.
    Bachtrog D; Thornton K; Clark A; Andolfatto P
    Evolution; 2006 Feb; 60(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 16610321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.
    Coyne JA; Kim SY; Chang AS; Lachaise D; Elwyn S
    Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2424-34. PubMed ID: 12583583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic studies of two sister species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, D. yakuba and D. santomea.
    Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Kim SY; Llopart A
    Genet Res; 2004 Aug; 84(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 15663255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine scale mapping of genomic introgressions within the Drosophila yakuba clade.
    Turissini DA; Matute DR
    PLoS Genet; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006971. PubMed ID: 28873409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative trait loci affecting the difference in pigmentation between Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.
    Carbone MA; Llopart A; deAngelis M; Coyne JA; Mackay TF
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):211-25. PubMed ID: 15972457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Cooper BS; Vanderpool D; Conner WR; Matute DR; Turelli M
    Genetics; 2019 Aug; 212(4):1399-1419. PubMed ID: 31227544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges.
    Chang AS
    Evolution; 2004 Apr; 58(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 15154554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene flow between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea in subunit V of cytochrome c oxidase: A potential case of cytonuclear cointrogression.
    Beck EA; Thompson AC; Sharbrough J; Brud E; Llopart A
    Evolution; 2015 Aug; 69(8):1973-86. PubMed ID: 26155926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolutionary novelties in islands: Drosophila santomea, a new melanogaster sister species from São Tomé.
    Lachaise D; Harry M; Solignac M; Lemeunier F; Bénassi V; Cariou ML
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1452):1487-95. PubMed ID: 11007323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.
    Peluffo AE; Nuez I; Debat V; Savisaar R; Stern DL; Orgogozo V
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2893-901. PubMed ID: 26511499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temperature-based extrinsic reproductive isolation in two species of Drosophila.
    Matute DR; Novak CJ; Coyne JA
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):595-612. PubMed ID: 19087181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila yakuba complex of species.
    Turissini DA; Liu G; David JR; Matute DR
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):557-75. PubMed ID: 25611516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual isolation and cuticular hydrocarbon differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.
    Mas F; Jallon JM
    J Chem Ecol; 2005 Nov; 31(11):2747-52. PubMed ID: 16132336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the melanogaster species subgroup of Drosophila.
    Solignac M; Monnerot M; Mounolou JC
    J Mol Evol; 1986; 23(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 3009834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.
    Comeault AA; Venkat A; Matute DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The genetic basis of postzygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba due to hybrid male sterility.
    Moehring AJ; Llopart A; Elwyn S; Coyne JA; Mackay TF
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 16510788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.