These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15965629)
1. Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: a reality monitoring analysis. Behrman BW; Richards RE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):279-301. PubMed ID: 15965629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: an archival analysis. Behrman BW; Davey SL Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 11688369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications. Clark SE; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups. Steblay NK Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance. Perfect TJ; Dennis I; Snell A Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):784-98. PubMed ID: 17852730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence. Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis. Wixted JT; Wells GL Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification. Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Charman SD; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]