These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15966122)

  • 1. Mundane misdeeds skew findings, researchers say.
    Dean C
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jun; ():F6. PubMed ID: 15966122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Many scientists admit to misconduct: degrees of deception vary in poll; researchers say findings could hurt the field.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2005 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15981403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. University panel faults cloning co-author.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 16514740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire--Revised (SMQ-R): validation and psychometric testing.
    Broome ME; Pryor E; Habermann B; Pulley L; Kincaid H
    Account Res; 2005; 12(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 16578917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When extra authors get in on the act.
    Tarnow E
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):657. PubMed ID: 11645150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work.
    Helton-Fauth W; Gaddis B; Scott G; Mumford M; Devenport L; Connelly S; Brown R
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):205-28. PubMed ID: 14989284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Researchers frustrated by Italian misconduct probe.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):13-14. PubMed ID: 28470221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.
    Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
    J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
    Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
    Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data audit by a regulatory agency: its effect and implication for others.
    Shapiro MF
    Account Res; 1992; 2(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 11653981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical-research official cites ethics woes.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 2000 Aug; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11873777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.