These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15966357)

  • 1. Coronary heart disease: an update on progress of the NSF.
    Peacock S
    Br J Community Nurs; 2005 Apr; 10(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 15966357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current targets: where are we going?
    Davis M
    Heart; 2003 May; 89 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii6-9; discussion ii35-7. PubMed ID: 12695426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is population coronary heart disease risk screening justified? A discussion of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease (Standard 4).
    Rouse A; Adab P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Oct; 51(471):834-7. PubMed ID: 11677709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.
    Hutchinson A; McIntosh A; Anderson J; Gilbert C; Field R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Sep; 53(494):690-6. PubMed ID: 15103876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential population impact of the UK government strategy for reducing the burden of coronary heart disease in England: comparing primary and secondary prevention strategies.
    Gemmell I; Heller RF; Payne K; Edwards R; Roland M; Durrington P
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Oct; 15(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17074870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing progress on the NSF for coronary heart disease.
    Torjesen I
    Nurs Times; 2007 Jan 23-29; 103(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 17294767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The implications of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease.
    Wierzbicki AS
    J R Soc Promot Health; 2000 Sep; 120(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 11077793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Assessment and implementation of guidelines].
    Kirchner H; Fiene M; Ollenschläger G
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Apr; 42(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 12701000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National audit of continence care for older people: management of faecal incontinence.
    Potter J; Peel P; Mian S; Lowe D; Irwin P; Pearson M; Wagg A
    Age Ageing; 2007 May; 36(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 17356002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Health of the Nation 4 years on: what have we done, what must we do?
    Troop P; Green S
    Br J Hosp Med; 1997 Feb 5-18; 57(3):81-2, 99-100. PubMed ID: 9196583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The association between quality of primary care, deprivation and cardiovascular outcomes: a cross-sectional study using data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
    Kiran T; Hutchings A; Dhalla IA; Furlong C; Jacobson B
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2010 Oct; 64(10):927-34. PubMed ID: 20820055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical governance--a new label for old ingredients: quality or quantity?
    Smith LF; Harris D
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 May; 49(442):339-40. PubMed ID: 10736880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population impact of stricter adherence to recommendations for pharmacological and lifestyle interventions over one year in patients with coronary heart disease.
    Gemmell I; Heller RF; McElduff P; Payne K; Butler G; Edwards R; Roland M; Durrington P
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Dec; 59(12):1041-6. PubMed ID: 16286491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The National Service Framework for coronary heart disease: the emperor's new clothes.
    Hampton JR
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 2000; 34(3):226-9; discussion 229-30. PubMed ID: 10904912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of health systems].
    Gromulska L; Wysocki MJ
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2010; 64(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 20976955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer care. Service redesign. A dangerous game to play.
    Thomas H
    Health Serv J; 2004 Nov; 114(5933):suppl 12-3. PubMed ID: 15597932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the Government doing to improve outcomes for patients with bowel cancer?
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 15521947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The patient with CHD: how should we translate international guidelines into clinical practice?
    Schwandt P; Betteridge J; Erkelens W; Mancini M; Ochsenhirt B; Parhofer KG; Paulweber B; Saner H; Volta SD
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2000 Apr; 10(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 10919172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Managers & medicine. Here's hoping...
    Siddall R
    Health Serv J; 2002 Feb; 112(5791):31-2. PubMed ID: 11913360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Socioeconomic deprivation, coronary heart disease prevalence and quality of care: a practice-level analysis in Rotherham using data from the new UK general practitioner Quality and Outcomes Framework.
    Strong M; Maheswaran R; Radford J
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Mar; 28(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 16436452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.