These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15967387)

  • 1. A positive or a negative confounding variable? A simple teaching aid for clinicians and students.
    Mehio-Sibai A; Feinleib M; Sibai TA; Armenian HK
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 15(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 15967387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regarding "A positive or a negative confounding variable? A simple teaching aid for clinicians and students".
    Weng HY
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 17(10):807. PubMed ID: 17870619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple formulas for gauging the potential impacts of population stratification bias.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 167(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17881384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Instrumental variables: application and limitations.
    Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
    Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 16617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Common errors in analysis of the relationship between variables].
    Moczko JA
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(10):1153-8. PubMed ID: 17288244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of random coefficient regression in accounting for residual confounding.
    Gustafson P; Greenland S
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):760-8. PubMed ID: 16984318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teaching population health as a basic science at Harvard Medical School.
    Finkelstein JA; McMahon GT; Peters A; Cadigan R; Biddinger P; Simon SR
    Acad Med; 2008 Apr; 83(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 18367890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Student evaluation of an integrated, spiral model of epidemiology education at the Ege University.
    Ocek ZA; Gursoy ST; Ciceklioglu M; Aksu F; Soyer MT
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2008 Jul; 21(2):126. PubMed ID: 19039744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students.
    Waterston SW; Stewart IJ
    Clin Anat; 2005 Jul; 18(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 15971223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Teaching biostatistics and epidemiology in a postgraduate medical institution: are we going in the right direction?
    Butt AK; Khan AA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(5):1192-7. PubMed ID: 19161093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confounding and bias in epidemiological investigations.
    Hammal DM; Bell CL
    Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2002 Sep; 19(6):375-81. PubMed ID: 12186359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Bias and confounding in the epidemiologic studies].
    Ren T; Zhan ST; Shen X; Meng FY; Hu YH; Li LM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 25(9):811-3. PubMed ID: 15555368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.