299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15967947)
1. Supreme disagreement: the highest court affirms an empty right.
Flood CM; Sullivan T
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15967947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Private medical care comes to Canada.
CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(3):225, 227. PubMed ID: 16076799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance.
Eggertson L
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CMA okays private health care for waiting patients.
Sibbald B
CMAJ; 2005 Sep; 173(6):585. PubMed ID: 16109752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lament for a health care system.
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):117, 119. PubMed ID: 16027410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard.
Ouellet R
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Public versus private: the medical resident perspective.
Hoyt B
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):898-9. PubMed ID: 16217114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court slaps for-sale sign on medicare.
McFarlane L
CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 15967948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [A future scenario from the horizon of Stockholm: diversity of health care management results in insurance coverage of the health care].
Eckerman I
Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(39):4339-40, 4343. PubMed ID: 11076478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Northern discomfort: the ills of the Canadian health system.
Haislmaier EF
Health Syst Rev; 1992; 25(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 10119866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Presidential musings: prescriptions for the nation.
Kondro W
CMAJ; 2007 Sep; 177(7):707-9. PubMed ID: 17717105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Private health insurance systems, constitution and the right to receive an equitable health care].
Zúñiga F A
Rev Med Chil; 2013 Apr; 141(4):514-8. PubMed ID: 23900373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Private v. public. Canada's Supreme Court decision shakes fundamentals of system.
Fuller C
Revolution (Oakl); 2005; 6(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 16187570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Just Medicare: the role of Canadian courts in determining health care rights and access.
Flood CM
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 16686238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Today or tomorrow?
Hollister D
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(2):592; author reply 952. PubMed ID: 17339692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A parallel private system would reduce waiting times in the public system.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Oct; 11(4):253-4. PubMed ID: 17018202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A parallel private system would reduce waiting times in the public system.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jan; 8(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 12683436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Private health insurance: in one door and out the other?
CMAJ; 2005 Sep; 173(6):565, 567. PubMed ID: 16157709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prescription drug benefits for seniors and public/private collaboration.
Brekke M
Beginnings; 2002; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 12046112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Covering America's uninsured.
Hoffman CB; Rowland D
Am J Nurs; 2007 Apr; 107(4):75-9. PubMed ID: 17413752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
