These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968031)

  • 1. Challenges in systematic reviews that evaluate drug efficacy or effectiveness.
    Santaguida PL; Helfand M; Raina P
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1066-72. PubMed ID: 15968031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies.
    Gartlehner G; Hansen RA; Nissman D; Lohr KN; Carey TS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1040-8. PubMed ID: 16980143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.
    Hartling L; McAlister FA; Rowe BH; Ezekowitz J; Friesen C; Klassen TP
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. PubMed ID: 15968035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature.
    Benzies KM; Premji S; Hayden KA; Serrett K
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2006; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17040510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms.
    Chou R; Helfand M
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1090-9. PubMed ID: 15968034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consumer-oriented interventions for evidence-based prescribing and medicines use: an overview of systematic reviews.
    Ryan R; Santesso N; Hill S; Lowe D; Kaufman C; Grimshaw J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 May; (5):CD007768. PubMed ID: 21563160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
    Chou R
    Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 18346061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.
    Kynoch K; Chang A; Coyer F; McArdle A
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Mar; 14(3):181-234. PubMed ID: 27532144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.
    Norris SL; Atkins D
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1112-9. PubMed ID: 15968036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
    Hartling L; Guise JM; Hempel S; Featherstone R; Mitchell MD; Motu'apuaka ML; Robinson KA; Schoelles K; Totten A; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Anderson J; Berliner E; Gozu A; Kato E; Paynter R; Umscheid CA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 28212677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.
    Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fehlings MG; Fourney DR; Chapman JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S10-8. PubMed ID: 21952182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses.
    Cramer K; Wiebe N; Moyer V; Hartling L; Williams K; Swingler G; Klassen TP
    BMC Pediatr; 2005 Sep; 5():38. PubMed ID: 16176579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of the value of requesting information from drug manufacturers for systematic reviews; 9 years of experience from the drug effectiveness review project.
    McDonagh MS; Thakurta S; Peterson K
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):172. PubMed ID: 30348228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.