These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968035)

  • 1. Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.
    Hartling L; McAlister FA; Rowe BH; Ezekowitz J; Friesen C; Klassen TP
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. PubMed ID: 15968035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.
    Norris SL; Atkins D
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1112-9. PubMed ID: 15968036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms.
    Chou R; Helfand M
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1090-9. PubMed ID: 15968034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
    Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Challenges in systematic reviews that evaluate drug efficacy or effectiveness.
    Santaguida PL; Helfand M; Raina P
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1066-72. PubMed ID: 15968031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.
    Shekelle PG; Morton SC; Suttorp MJ; Buscemi N; Friesen C;
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. PubMed ID: 15968028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature.
    Benzies KM; Premji S; Hayden KA; Serrett K
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2006; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17040510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Whitlock EP; Lopez SA; Chang S; Helfand M; Eder M; Floyd N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 19540721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standards for therapeutic trials.
    Spodick DH; Aronow W; Lown B; Barber B; Mathur VS; Blackburn H; McIntosh HD; Boyd D; Preston TA; Conti CR; Selzer A; LoGerfo JP; Takaro T
    Ann Intern Med; 1978 Sep; 89(3):422. PubMed ID: 686557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evidence-based medicine in surgical practice - locating clinical studies and systematic reviews by searching the Medline database].
    Grummich K; Jensen K; Obst O; Seiler CM; Diener MK
    Zentralbl Chir; 2014 Dec; 139 Suppl 2():e116-23. PubMed ID: 23115027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.
    Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fehlings MG; Fourney DR; Chapman JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S10-8. PubMed ID: 21952182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.
    Tatsioni A; Zarin DA; Aronson N; Samson DJ; Flamm CR; Schmid C; Lau J
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. PubMed ID: 15968029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].
    Schnabel A; Kranke P
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2010 Jul; 45(7-8):510-8. PubMed ID: 20665362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews.
    Treadwell JR; Singh S; Talati R; McPheeters ML; Reston JT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1159-62. PubMed ID: 23017634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.