89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968149)
1. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Lee SH; Chung HK; Cho KS; Park IA; Noh DY
Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 15968149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term outcome of 9G MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results of 293 single-center procedures and underestimation rate of high-risk lesions over 12 years.
Rescinito G; Brunetti N; Garlaschi A; Tosto S; Gristina L; Conti B; Pieroni D; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Radiol Med; 2024 May; 129(5):767-775. PubMed ID: 38512628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonography-guided 14-gauge core biopsy of the breast: results of 7 years of experience.
Jung I; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
Ultrasonography; 2018 Jan; 37(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 28641365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical predictors of malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy.
Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D; Brzuszkiewicz K; Szpor J; Kibil W; Matyja A; Dyląg-Trojanowska K; Richter P; Szczepanik AM
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2018 Jun; 13(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 30002750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of breast core needle biopsy technique on detection of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia.
Smetherman D; Dydynski P; Jackson P
Ochsner J; 2007; 7(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 21603526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pure Fibrocystic Change Diagnosed at MRI-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Imaging Features and Follow-up Outcomes.
Chen ST; Okamoto S; Daniel BL; Covelli J; DeMartini WB; Ikeda DM
J Breast Imaging; 2020 Mar; 2(2):141-146. PubMed ID: 38424890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy: Radiological-pathological correlation and underestimation rate in pre-surgical assessment.
Meucci R; Pistolese Chiara A; Perretta T; Vanni G; Portarena I; Manenti G; Ryan Colleen P; Castrignanò A; Di Stefano C; Ferrari D; Lamacchia F; Pellicciaro M; Materazzo M; Buonomo Oreste C
Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100244. PubMed ID: 32715029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions in surgical de-escalation: where are we?
Miranda BMM; Bitencourt AGV
Radiol Bras; 2023; 56(3):150-156. PubMed ID: 37564079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of malignant spiculated mass lesions on mammogram: Do we include the length of the spicules?
Bhatia M; Ahmed R; Nagarajakumar A; Alani A; Doddi S; Metafa A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Oct; 19(7):1794-1796. PubMed ID: 38376280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ultrasound-Guided Intervention for Breast Lesions].
Ko EY
J Korean Soc Radiol; 2023 Mar; 84(2):332-344. PubMed ID: 37051398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning curve in ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision of breast lesions for surgeons and ultrasound physicians.
Shen W; Sun Y; Song Y; Cui L; Jiang L
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Mar; 13(3):1478-1487. PubMed ID: 36915354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the clinical and pathological characteristics of ultrasound-guided biopsy for breast masses and non-mass lesions between 16-gauge spring-loaded core needle biopsy and 12-gauge spring-loaded vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Yashima Y; Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Sato A; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Tanaka M; Tateishi U
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Apr; 50(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 36645627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Both a biopsy method and a therapeutic procedure in BI-RADS 4A and 4B lesions: Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Dinç Elibol F; Dere Y; Belli AK; Elibol C; Dere Ö; Nazlı O
Turk J Surg; 2020 Mar; 36(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 32637878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors for upstaging of ductal carcinoma
Oda G; Nakagawa T; Ogawa A; Kumaki Y; Hosoya T; Sugimoto H; Ishiba T; Mio M; Fujioka T; Kubota K; Onishi I; Uetake H
Mol Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 13(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 32454975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.
Hrkac Pustahija A; Ivanac G; Brkljacic B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Jul; 24(4):187-194. PubMed ID: 30091708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?
Nakano S; Imawari Y; Mibu A; Otsuka M; Oinuma T
Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180250. PubMed ID: 29975150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang XC; Hu XH; Wang XR; Zhou CX; Wang FF; Yang S; Wang GY
Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):999-1008. PubMed ID: 29549564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating imaging-pathology concordance and discordance after ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.
Park VY; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ
Ultrasonography; 2018 Apr; 37(2):107-120. PubMed ID: 29169231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound-guided cable-free 13-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy of non-mass breast lesions.
Seo J; Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Lee SH; Kim EK; Kang E; Park SY; Moon WK; Choi HY; Kim B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179182. PubMed ID: 28628656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial Experience with a Wireless Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Device.
Choi ER; Han BK; Ko ES; Ko EY; Choi JS; Cho EY; Nam SJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144046. PubMed ID: 26630136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
