These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968157)
1. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy. van Schaick W; van Dooren BT; Mulder PG; Völker-Dieben HJ Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15968157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system. Cheung SW; Cho P Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system. Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images. Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy. Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Modak C; Marion K; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL J Optom; 2018; 11(3):182-191. PubMed ID: 28797649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images. Doughty MJ; Aakre BM Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy. Al Farhan HM; Al Otaibi WM; Al Razqan HM; Al Harqan AA BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 13():73. PubMed ID: 24274022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of recording systems and analysis methods in specular microscopy. Ohno K; Nelson LR; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM Cornea; 1999 Jul; 18(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 10422853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes. Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium. Huang J; Maram J; Tepelus TC; Sadda SR; Chopra V; Lee OL Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S144-S150. PubMed ID: 28346276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved Interchangeability with Different Corneal Specular Microscopes for Quantitative Endothelial Cell Analysis. van Rijn GA; Wijnen CJF; van Dooren BT; Cheng YY; Beenakker JM; Luyten GP Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():61-70. PubMed ID: 32021069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used? Doughty MJ Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endothelial cell density and characterization of corneal endothelial cells in the Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) using specular microscopy. Coyo N; Leiva M; Costa D; Molina R; Nicolás O; Ríos J; Peña MT Vet Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 22(2):177-182. PubMed ID: 29762889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis. de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods. Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Gavet Y; Acquart S; Garraud O; Egelhoffer H; Gain P Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2062-7. PubMed ID: 17460261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the corneal endothelium using noncontact and contact specular microscopy. Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A; Módis L Cornea; 2011 May; 30(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 21598434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measured by non-contact specular microscopy and pachymetry in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension. Ollivier FJ; Brooks DE; Komaromy AM; Kallberg ME; Andrew SE; Sapp HL; Sherwood MB; Dawson WW Exp Eye Res; 2003 Jun; 76(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 12742349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specular microscopes. Goldich Y; Marcovich AL; Barkana Y; Hartstein M; Morad Y; Avni I; Zadok D Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 20175056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P. Cho P; Cheung SW Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 11120570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]