137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968158)
1. Limits of agreement between the optical pachymeter and a noncontact specular microscope.
Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 15968158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements measured with the Topcon SP2000P specular microscope.
Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 243(8):798-802. PubMed ID: 16133035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a recently developed noncontact specular microscope in comparison with conventional pachymetry devices.
Módis L; Szalai E; Németh G; Berta A
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 20213610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative anatomical differences in central corneal thickness values determined with scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy.
Sanchis-Gimeno JA; Herrera M; Lleó-Pérez A; Alonso L; Rahhal MS; Martínez-Soriano F
Cornea; 2006 Feb; 25(2):203-5. PubMed ID: 16371783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal thickness measurements: scanning-slit corneal topography and noncontact specular microscopy versus ultrasonic pachymetry.
Suzuki S; Oshika T; Oki K; Sakabe I; Iwase A; Amano S; Araie M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1313-8. PubMed ID: 12900238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II scanning slit topography, noncontact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes with keratoconus.
Kawana K; Miyata K; Tokunaga T; Kiuchi T; Hiraoka T; Oshika T
Cornea; 2005 Nov; 24(8):967-71. PubMed ID: 16227843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of optical coherence reflectometry and ultrasound central corneal pachymetry.
Gillis A; Zeyen T
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2004; (292):71-5. PubMed ID: 15253494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements-Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope.
Jiang JY; Ong K
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 31356366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in central corneal thickness values after instillation of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4%.
Ogbuehi KC; Chijuka JC; Osuagwu UL
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Oct; 35(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 22704944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness.
Fujioka M; Nakamura M; Tatsumi Y; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Curr Eye Res; 2007 Feb; 32(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17364741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.
Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Elbaz U; Schwartz S; Ken-Dror G; Avni I; Zadok D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1729-35. PubMed ID: 16246776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE
J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dependability of pachymetry measurements after myopic advanced surface ablation using scanning-slit topography and specular microscopy.
López-Miguel A; Martínez-Almeida L; Mateo ME; Coco-Martín MB; Alió JL; Maldonado MJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1054-60. PubMed ID: 23329670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measured by non-contact specular microscopy and pachymetry in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension.
Ollivier FJ; Brooks DE; Komaromy AM; Kallberg ME; Andrew SE; Sapp HL; Sherwood MB; Dawson WW
Exp Eye Res; 2003 Jun; 76(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 12742349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of central corneal thickness as measured by non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and post LASIK.
Zhao MH; Zou J; Wang WQ; Li J
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 35(9):818-23. PubMed ID: 18173409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymeter, optical coherence tomography and corneal topography.
Pholshivin P; Tangpagasit W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95 Suppl 4():S123-8. PubMed ID: 22696864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy between central and midperipheral corneal thickness measurements obtained with slit-scanning pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy.
Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2127-35. PubMed ID: 19969219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.
Tam ES; Rootman DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1179-84. PubMed ID: 12842687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
