127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968188)
1. Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures.
Karl M; Rösch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Implant Dent; 2005 Jun; 14(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 15968188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Winter W; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 14982352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
Karl M; Taylor TD; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16433647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural changes in ceramic veneered three-unit implant-supported restorations as a consequence of static and dynamic loading.
Karl M; Fischer H; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 17669484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
Karl M; Holst S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A double casting technique to minimize distortion when constructing fixed partial dentures on implants.
Luk HW; Pow EH; McMillan AS; Hui CF
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 14739901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microfractures in metal-ceramic and all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses caused by superstructure fixation.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Beck N
Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 22673463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the fit of implant prosthetics: an in vitro study.
Yannikakis S; Prombonas A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 23377057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]