BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968483)

  • 1. [Drug utilization and pharmaceutical cost-containment in germany-perspectives 1 year after enactment of the GMG].
    Schlander M
    Med Klin (Munich); 2005 Jun; 100(6):314-24. PubMed ID: 15968483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multifaceted national and regional drug reforms and initiatives in ambulatory care in Sweden: global relevance.
    Godman B; Wettermark B; Hoffmann M; Andersson K; Haycox A; Gustafsson LL
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 19371180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using disease management and market reforms to address the adverse economic effects of drug budgets and price and reimbursement regulations in Germany.
    Schwermann T; Greiner W; v d Schulenburg JM
    Value Health; 2003; 6 Suppl 1():S20-30. PubMed ID: 12846923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost containment: Europe. Germany.
    Burchardi H; Schuster HP; Zielmann S
    New Horiz; 1994 Aug; 2(3):364-74. PubMed ID: 8087598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategic choices for cost containment under a reformed U.S. health care system.
    Kilbreth E; Cohen AB
    Inquiry; 1993; 30(4):372-88. PubMed ID: 8288401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmaceuticals: pharmaceutical cost controls--2005. End of Year Issue Brief.
    Seay M; Varma P
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2005 Dec; ():1-20. PubMed ID: 16708455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Political decisions and implementation: efficient management of a psychiatric department be successful despite working time law, practice fee and other innovations?].
    Wittmund B
    Psychiatr Prax; 2005 Apr; 32(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 15818523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cost-effectiveness evaluation of drugs: multidisciplinary collaboration and transparency are key].
    Mueller EA; Kirch W
    Med Klin (Munich); 2008 Oct; 103(10):712-6. PubMed ID: 18936896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Consequences of the German AMNOG for the identification of study objectives to demonstrate clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of innovative drugs].
    Götte D
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2012 Feb; 137(6):274-80. PubMed ID: 22270904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria].
    Führlinger S
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2006 Dec; 156(23-24):612-8. PubMed ID: 17211765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early benefit assessment for pharmaceuticals in Germany: lessons for policymakers.
    Schlette S; Hess R
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2013 Oct; 29():1-9. PubMed ID: 24171232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Economical evaluation of drugs. A steering method for the pharmaceutical sector of the 1990's?].
    Grund J; Husbyn H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Mar; 114(8):947-50. PubMed ID: 8191475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do policy changes in the pharmaceutical reimbursement schedule affect drug expenditures? Interrupted time series analysis of cost, volume and cost per volume trends in Sweden 1986-2002.
    Andersson K; Petzold MG; Sonesson C; Lönnroth K; Carlsten A
    Health Policy; 2006 Dec; 79(2-3):231-43. PubMed ID: 16473436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making in Germany: is health economic evaluation as a supporting tool a sleeping beauty?
    Gerber-Grote A; Sandmann FG; Zhou M; Ten Thoren C; Schwalm A; Weigel C; Balg C; Mensch A; Mostardt S; Seidl A; Lhachimi SK
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):390-6. PubMed ID: 25444297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European perspective on the costs and cost-effectiveness of cancer therapies.
    Drummond MF; Mason AR
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jan; 25(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17210939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluation and pharmaceutical reimbursement reform in South Korea's National Health Insurance.
    Yang BM; Bae EY; Kim J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 18180493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expenditures for prescription drugs: too much or not enough?
    Schumock GT; Walton SM
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Oct; 57(10):34-8, 41. PubMed ID: 14560578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.
    Meropol NJ; Schrag D; Smith TJ; Mulvey TM; Langdon RM; Blum D; Ubel PA; Schnipper LE;
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 19581533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missouri Medicaid reform...what can physicians do?
    Halverson LW
    Mo Med; 2006; 103(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 16703704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.