BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968563)

  • 1. Measuring health-related utility: why the disparity between EQ-5D and SF-6D?
    Bryan S; Longworth L
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Sep; 6(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
    Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients.
    Longworth L; Bryan S
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1061-7. PubMed ID: 14673814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease.
    van Stel HF; Buskens E
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Mar; 4():20. PubMed ID: 16563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unchained melody: revisiting the estimation of SF-6D values.
    Craig BM
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):865-73. PubMed ID: 26359242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality-adjusted life expectancies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis--comparison of index scores from EQ-5D, 15D, and SF-6D.
    Sørensen J; Linde L; Ostergaard M; Hetland ML
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):334-9. PubMed ID: 22433765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
    Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to estimate health state utility values: mapping from the MSIS-29, version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D.
    Hawton A; Green C; Telford C; Zajicek J; Wright D
    Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1084-91. PubMed ID: 23244811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).
    Gerhards SA; Huibers MJ; Theunissen KA; de Graaf LE; Widdershoven GA; Evers SM
    Value Health; 2011; 14(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 21839412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EQ-5D versus SF-12 in coronary patients: are they interchangeable?
    De Smedt D; Clays E; Annemans L; De Bacquer D
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24438721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores in a study of patients with schizophrenia.
    McCrone P; Patel A; Knapp M; Schene A; Koeter M; Amaddeo F; Ruggeri M; Giessler A; Puschner B; Thornicroft G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2009 Mar; 12(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19346564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between body mass index and health-related quality of life: comparing the EQ-5D, EuroQol VAS and SF-6D.
    Sach TH; Barton GR; Doherty M; Muir KR; Jenkinson C; Avery AJ
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jan; 31(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 16682976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
    Petrou S; Hockley C
    Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
    Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
    J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D in long-lasting low back pain.
    Søgaard R; Christensen FB; Videbaek TS; Bünger C; Christiansen T
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):606-12. PubMed ID: 19900258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do the EQ-5D, SF-6D and the well-being rating scale compare in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?
    Boonen A; van der Heijde D; Landewé R; van Tubergen A; Mielants H; Dougados M; van der Linden S
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2007 Jun; 66(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17213254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Marra CA; Woolcott JC; Kopec JA; Shojania K; Offer R; Brazier JE; Esdaile JM; Anis AH
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1571-82. PubMed ID: 15652688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population.
    Bharmal M; Thomas J
    Value Health; 2006; 9(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 16903996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric properties of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Aggarwal R; Wilke CT; Pickard AS; Vats V; Mikolaitis R; Fogg L; Block JA; Jolly M
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1209-16. PubMed ID: 19369452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference weights for the spectrum of alcohol use in the U.S. Population.
    Chavez LJ; Bradley K; Tefft N; Liu CF; Hebert P; Devine B
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2016 Apr; 161():206-13. PubMed ID: 26900145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.