These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15968970)

  • 1. Towards cost-value analysis in health care?
    Nord E
    Health Care Anal; 1999; 7(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 15968970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-value analysis of health interventions: introduction and update on methods and preference data.
    Nord E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Feb; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 25488879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Report's framework offers good foundation for future prioritization of health care that is applicable across health care systems.
    Vuorenkoski L
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):108-10; discussion W40-2. PubMed ID: 16192163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economics, QALYs and medical ethics--a health economist's perspective.
    Williams A
    Health Care Anal; 1995 Aug; 3(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10151641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QALYs: is the value of treatment proportional to the size of the health gain?
    Nord E; Enge AU; Gundersen V
    Health Econ; 2010 May; 19(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 19459186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hidden costs: The ethics of cost-effectiveness analyses for health interventions in resource-limited settings.
    Rutstein SE; Price JT; Rosenberg NE; Rennie SM; Biddle AK; Miller WC
    Glob Public Health; 2017 Oct; 12(10):1269-1281. PubMed ID: 27141969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis for priority-setting in South Africa--what are the possibilities?
    Doherty J
    S Afr Med J; 2010 Dec; 100(12):816-21. PubMed ID: 21414274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework.
    Peacock SJ; Mitton C; Ruta D; Donaldson C; Bate A; Hedden L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Oct; 10(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 20950070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ethical basis of priority setting in healthcare].
    Marckmann G
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Sep; 53(9):867-73. PubMed ID: 20853082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring elusive benefits: on the value of health.
    Mendeloff J
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1983; 8(3):554-80. PubMed ID: 6417222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concerns for severity in priority setting in health care: a review of trade-off data in preference studies and implications for societal willingness to pay for a QALY.
    Nord E; Johansen R
    Health Policy; 2014 Jun; 116(2-3):281-8. PubMed ID: 24690334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The ethical problems in limiting the role for cost-effectiveness].
    Sandman L; Davidson T; Helgesson G; Juth N
    Lakartidningen; 2018 Jun; 115():. PubMed ID: 29893984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [How much does the society want to pay?].
    Norheim OF
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Feb; 123(3):303. PubMed ID: 12640893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value in Health: How It Is Defined and Used in Priority Setting and Pricing in Norway.
    Melberg HO
    Healthc Pap; 2019 Oct; 18(3):22-28. PubMed ID: 31642804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-utility analysis: use QALYs only with great caution.
    McGregor M
    CMAJ; 2003 Feb; 168(4):433-4. PubMed ID: 12591784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Aspects of health economic evaluations as a contribution to the priority-setting debate in Germany].
    Brüggenjürgen B
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Sep; 53(9):890-5. PubMed ID: 20853085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prioritization does not place in an ethical vacuum].
    Schulze J
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Jun; 156(12):13. PubMed ID: 25369666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Economic evaluation in health care].
    Zechmeister I; Radlberger P
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2009; 159(5-6):160-8. PubMed ID: 19343294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Priority setting in practice: what is the best way to compare costs and benefits?
    Wilson EC; Peacock SJ; Ruta D
    Health Econ; 2009 Apr; 18(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 18561215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.