These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15969835)

  • 1. Modelling non-ignorable missing-data mechanisms with item response theory models.
    Holman R; Glas CA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):1-17. PubMed ID: 15969835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision of the ICIDH Severity of Disabilities Scale by data linking and item response theory.
    van Buuren S; Hopman-Rock M
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1061-76. PubMed ID: 11276036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing multivariate mean collinearity via latent variable modelling.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):481-90. PubMed ID: 19840492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of missing data and differential item functioning on theta estimates from two polytomous Rasch family models.
    Furlow CF; Fouladi RT; Gagne P; Whittaker TA
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 18250525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian analysis of mixtures in structural equation models with non-ignorable missing data.
    Cai JH; Song XY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):491-508. PubMed ID: 20030969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
    Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating person locations from partial credit data containing missing responses.
    De Ayala RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(3):278-91. PubMed ID: 16807494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginalized transition models for longitudinal binary data with ignorable and non-ignorable drop-out.
    Kurland BF; Heagerty PJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2673-95. PubMed ID: 15316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling.
    Allison PD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 14674868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias due to missing exposure data using complete-case analysis in the proportional hazards regression model.
    Demissie S; LaValley MP; Horton NJ; Glynn RJ; Cupples LA
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 12590413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating slope and level change in N = 1 designs.
    Solanas A; Manolov R; Onghena P
    Behav Modif; 2010 May; 34(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 20234005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using logistic regression to detect item-level non-response bias in surveys.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):234-48. PubMed ID: 12904674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A copula model for repeated measurements with non-ignorable non-monotone missing outcome.
    Shen C; Weissfeld L
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2427-40. PubMed ID: 16143999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian analysis of mixture structural equation models with non-ignorable missing responses and covariates.
    Cai JH; Song XY; Hser YI
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(18):1861-74. PubMed ID: 20680980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model.
    Molenaar D; Dolan CV; Verhelst ND
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):293-317. PubMed ID: 19796474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handling missing responses in generalized linear mixed model without specifying missing mechanism.
    Zhang H; Paik MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Nov; 19(6):1001-17. PubMed ID: 20183461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item response bias was present in instrumental activity of daily living scale in Asian older adults.
    Niti M; Ng TP; Chiam PC; Kua EH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):366-74. PubMed ID: 17346611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.